(Corrects headline of story published May 22 to say airline industry may escape emissions standard for another year. Clarifies fourth paragraph to say ICAO aims to reduce emissions from aviation and adds word metric instead of measure in the fifth.)
Airline industry agreement on a standard measure of aircraft greenhouse-gas emissions may be delayed at least a year for more research, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization.
ICAO’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection proposed using a plane’s maximum take-off weight, or MTOW, to help gauge aircraft emissions and efficiency, the Montreal-based regulatory body said in July. The ICAO council was expected to approve the system this year, it said at the time.
“Standards, not to mention the broad consensus which effective ones require, take time to develop,” Anthony Philbin, a spokesman for ICAO in Montreal, said yesterday by e-mail. “The present timetable looks to it being more fully resolved by end-2014 or possibly sometime in 2015.”
The United Nations-overseen body is seeking to reduce emissions from aviation. The European Union broadened its carbon market to cover airlines in January 2012. Europe can replace its aviation targets with a global measure as long as it’s as stringent as the EU’s, Connie Hedegaard, the bloc’s climate chief, said in February 2012.
Critics of ICAO’s metric include Dimitri Simos, founder of aeronautics software company Lissys Ltd. in Woodhouse Eaves, England, who argues it should include an aircraft’s empty weight rather than the more theoretical MTOW.
“It was flawed at its heart” because it’s an incomplete picture of aircraft emissions, said Simos, whose clients have included Boeing Co. and Airbus SAS. A more stringent metric would stop airlines from “getting away with things that may be commercially beneficial but are bad for the environment” such as using inefficient aircraft, he said.
Lissys’s Piano software has been approved under ICAO’s models for determining aircraft fuel burn.
The airline regulator’s standard is still in a research-and-development stage and criticism is premature, Philbin said. ICAO called the metric a “major move forward” in July.
“ICAO has no comment on the supposed positions of any industry operators or manufacturers who may be assisting in this process,” Philbin said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Mathew Carr in London at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Lars Paulsson at email@example.com