Brazil Swap Rates Fall on China Manufacturing; Real Strengthens

Brazilian swap rates fell as a report that showed manufacturing improved less than forecast in China, the country’s top trade partner, fueled speculation that policy makers will limit borrowing-cost increases.

Swap rates due January 2015 fell six basis points, or 0.06 percentage point, to 8.23 percent at 10:38 a.m. in Sao Paulo, the lowest on a closing basis since Feb. 14. The real rose 0.3 percent to 2.0137 per dollar.

A preliminary April reading of 50.5 for a purchasing manager’s index published by HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) and Markit Economics compared with 51.6 in March. The median estimate of 11 economists surveyed by Bloomberg was 51.5. A figure above 50 means the number of manufacturers who said conditions improved was greater than those who said they deteriorated.

“Policy makers made it clear that the foreign scenario is a main source of uncertainty for Brazil and the world economy’s data has disappointed,” said Marcelo Fonseca, an economist at M Safra & Co DTVM, in a phone interview from Sao Paulo. “It will be difficult for the central bank to not raise rates in May, but the bets tend to converge toward a hike of 25 basis points. The total tightening cycle could be just 100 or even 75 basis points.”

The central bank’s board last week voted 6 to 2 to raise the target lending rate by 25 basis points to 7.50 percent from a record low 7.25 percent. A survey by Bloomberg showed that 18 of 58 economists had forecast an increase of 50 basis points.

Policy makers said in their statement that “resilience of inflation” required a response tempered by the central bank’s recognition that “external uncertainties” also required “that monetary policy be managed with caution.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Blake Schmidt in Sao Paulo at; Josue Leonel in Sao Paulo at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Papadopoulos at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.