GM, Ford to Jointly Design More Fuel-Efficient Transmissions

General Motors Co. (GM) and Ford Motor Co. (F), which share a six-speed transmission, are designing nine- and 10-speed automatic versions that are more fuel-efficient for cars, trucks and sport-utility vehicles.

By working together, the U.S. automakers can develop and bring the new transmissions to market faster and at a lower cost than if they work alone, according to a joint statement today.

“The goal is to keep hardware identical in the Ford and GM transmissions,” Craig Renneker, Ford’s chief engineer for transmission, driveline component and pre-program engineering, said in the statement. The companies will use their own control software to ensure that each transmission is “carefully matched” to their individual brand-specific vehicles, he said.

GM and Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford are adding more vehicles with better fuel usage to compete against Japanese carmakers such as Toyota Motor Corp. (7203) GM earlier this month said it plans to spend $332 million at four factories to create more fuel-efficient engines and transmissions.

The nine- and 10-speeds announced today should improve fuel efficiency by about 5 percent, Mark Schirmer, a Ford spokesman, said in a telephone interview.

While the companies didn’t say when the new transmissions will go into vehicles, it took about three years from the time they announced a similar agreement for six-speed transmissions in 2003 for the first ones to go into service, Dan Flores, a spokesman for Detroit-based GM, said in the same interview.

The companies’ six-speed partnership has led to 8 million of the front-wheel transmissions being used in vehicles such as the Ford Fusion and Chevrolet Malibu, GM and Ford said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tim Higgins in Detroit at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Bill Koenig at; Jamie Butters at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.