Loans for Nine Projects Considered by U.S. After Solyndra

The U.S. Energy Department is reviewing nine applications from companies seeking $4.8 billion in clean-energy loan guarantees, the first since the collapse of Solyndra LLC unleashed an avalanche of Republican criticism.

A Government Accountability Office report today showed applications for eight energy-efficiency and renewable-energy projects valued at $2 billion and a coal gasification plant that can capture carbon-dioxide emissions for $2.8 billion.

The department hasn’t issued a loan or loan guarantee since September 2011 when its authority under a stimulus-financed program expired. Loan guarantees were criticized by Republican lawmakers after Solyndra, a solar-panel maker in California, went bankrupt two years after winning a $535 million U.S. guarantee.

The loan program under which Solyndra won its backing delivered a total of $16 billion to 28 companies as part of the 2009 economic stimulus.

Separately, Congress appropriated $170 million in April 2011 to support a new round of guarantees to cutting-edge projects through guarantees.

Of the pending energy-efficiency and renewable-energy initiatives, two are biomass, one is solar generation, three are solar manufacturing and two are wind generation, according to the GAO, which doesn’t identify any of the projects.

The Energy Department declined to give GAO, Congress’s investigative arm, an estimate as to when the projects would gain U.S. backing. Some applicants told auditors that they expected to have the guarantees within the next six months.

The Energy Department has issued a conditional commitment for an $8.3 billion loan guarantee to Southern Co. (SO) for the construction of the Vogtle nuclear-power plant in Georgia.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jim Snyder in Washington at jsnyder24@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.