Fannie Mae Preferred Stock Soars to High Since Bailout Month

Preferred and common stock of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FMCC) soared after four Senators proposed legislation related to the mortgage financiers that were placed into government conservatorships in September 2008.

Fannie Mae (FNMA)’s 8.25 percent preferred shares climbed to $2.96 as of 4:15 p.m. in New York from $2.08 on March 13, reaching the highest since the month of its bailout, when the dividends were suspended. The Washington-based company’s common stock rose to 40 cents, the highest since May 2011, from 29.2 cents.

The securities may be worthless unless the companies can pay off the funds they owe to taxpayers or see their bailouts reworked. Lawmakers including Tennessee Republican Bob Corker and Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, yesterday introduced a bill that would prohibit increases in the firms’ mortgage- guarantee fees to pay for other government spending, as well as ban sales of senior-ranking U.S. Treasury-owned preferred shares without congressional approval.

“It’s not clear why” the “Treasury would sell the preferred or why anyone would want to own it,” Jim Vogel, an analyst at FTN Financial in Memphis, Tennessee, wrote in a note to clients.

The Treasury bought $187.5 billion of senior preferred shares in the two companies to help them remain solvent. The government, which starting this year will be paid any profits they make under a revision to their bailout agreements in August, also owns 79.9 percent of their equity.

Fannie Mae also said yesterday it expects to report “significant net income” for both the last quarter of 2012 and the full year. It will miss a March 18 deadline for reporting more details on the earnings as it analyzes how to handle some deferred tax assets, the company said in a securities filing.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jody Shenn in New York at jshenn@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Alan Goldstein at agoldstein5@bloomberg.net

Bloomberg reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.