Credit Agricole Wins Dismissal of Intesa CDO Fraud Suit

Credit Agricole SA, France’s third- biggest lender, won dismissal of lawsuit brought by Intesa Sanpaolo SpA over claims it was defrauded in a collateralized debt obligation investment.

U.S. District Judge Robert W. Sweet in Manhattan yesterday ruled that Intesa’s claims were time-barred, having been filed “exactly one month too late.” Sweet said Intesa could file another complaint within 20 days.

Intesa claimed in the suit filed last year that it lost $180 million after Credit Agricole’s Calyon unit induced it in 2006 to invest in a CDO secretly structured by Magnetar Capital LLC to lose money.

Intesa argued Calyon told investors that the CDO -- known as Pyxis ABS CDO 2006-1 -- was based on residential mortgage- backed securities that had been chosen by an independent investment firm, Putnam Advisory Co., when the underlying securities were really selected by Magnetar.

Putnam was also named as a defendant in the case.

Intesa, based in Turin, Italy, and formerly known as Banca Intesa SpA, seeks unspecified money damages in its fraud lawsuit.

Philippe Selendy, a lawyer for Intesa, didn’t immediately return a call yesterday seeking comment on the ruling.

The case is Intesa v. Credit Agricole, 12-cv-02683, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Joel Rosenblatt in San Francisco at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.