Floating-Home Owner Backed by Top Court in Casino Victory

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the owner of a floating home in a decision that may shield dockside casinos from some lawsuits by workers and customers.

The justices’ 7-2 decision limited the reach of federal maritime law. The court said the disputed Florida home didn’t qualify as a “vessel” under the law because it wasn’t designed to carry people or things over the water.

The ruling is a victory for Fane Lozman, whose 60-foot, two-story home was the subject of a years-long dispute with the Florida city of Riviera Beach. The city, saying Lozman owed $3,000 in dockage fees, used federal maritime law to seize the home and later destroy it.

The decision is also a win for the casino industry and at least 60 floating casinos. The American Gaming Association told the justices that a ruling against Lozman might have forced casinos to defend against a new category of lawsuits under federal laws designed to protect seamen and harbor workers.

The case is Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 11-626.

To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarow1@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.