Rebar Set for Biggest Monthly Gain Since 2009 on Demand Revival

Steel reinforcement-bar futures gained in China, heading for the biggest monthly advance in almost three and a half years, after data showed that the country’s manufacturing expanded in December.

Rebar for delivery in May rose as much as 1.4 percent to 3,969 yuan ($637) a metric ton on the Shanghai Futures Exchange, the highest most-active price since July 10, and was at 3,963 yuan at 11:30 a.m. local time. Prices have gained 13 percent in December, the most since July 2009, paring a second annual drop.

China’s economy may have rebounded in the final three months of the year after a seven-quarter slowdown as the government increased infrastructure spending and accelerated investment-project approvals. A purchasing Managers’ Index was at 51.5 in December, according to the final reading from HSBC Holdings Plc and Markit Economics today. That’s the highest level since May 2011, and compares with a preliminary figure of 50.9 on Dec. 14. A figure above 50 indicates expansion.

“Confidence over an economic recovery is driving up prices of steel and iron ore,” said Xia Junyan, a Shanghai-based analyst at Wanda Futures Co. Steelmakers are poised to replenish their inventories of iron ore to feed production, underpinning prices, Xia said.

Stockpiles of ore at China’s major ports, owned mostly by mills and traders, fell 3.3 percent to 71.32 million metric tons as of Dec. 21, the lowest since Sept. 10, 2010, according to data from researcher Beijing Antaike Information Development Co.

Ore with 62 percent iron content delivered to the Chinese port of Tianjin was unchanged at $139.40 a dry ton Dec. 28, after reaching the highest level since May 9 the day before, according to a gauge compiled by The Steel Index.

To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Helen Yuan in Shanghai at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jake Lloyd-Smith at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.