Rosneft Jousting With Gazprom for Bonds in 2013: Russia Credit

OAO Rosneft (ROSN), negotiating with banks over $30 billion of loans, will vie with Russian gas producer OAO Gazprom for bond investors next year as it seeks to fund a takeover making it the biggest publicly traded oil company.

State-run Rosneft sold $3 billion of bonds last month to help finance a $55 billion takeover of TNK-BP. The yield on the debt due in March 2022 dropped 18 basis points since the sale to 4.02 percent on Dec. 14, compared with 4.08 percent for similar- maturity Gazprom notes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Yields for Petroleos Mexicanos, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer, were 3.25 percent for equivalent debt.

Russia’s largest oil company has $7 billion of a bond program left to sell as it seeks to boost oil output through the TNK-BP purchase to more than 4 million barrels a day, surpassing that of Beijing-based PetroChina Co. Investors will be receptive to the company’s bonds after Rosneft raised less than expected in its debut sale, according to Union Investment Privatfonds.

“Rosneft will in 2013 outpace Gazprom (GAZP) as the key Russian borrower since the recent Eurobond deal was well managed,” Sergey Dergachev, a portfolio manager at Privatfonds in Frankfurt, said by e-mail on Dec. 13. “They have issued less than originally planned, conserving some ammunition for 2013.”

Photographer: Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr./Bloomberg

Light trails from passing automobiles are seen outside a gas station operated by OAO Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil producer, in Moscow, Russia. Close

Light trails from passing automobiles are seen outside a gas station operated by OAO... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr./Bloomberg

Light trails from passing automobiles are seen outside a gas station operated by OAO Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil producer, in Moscow, Russia.

Energy Companies

Unlike Rosneft, Gazprom won’t make any “huge” bond deals and will borrow to refinance bonds maturing in 2013 and 2014, Dergachev said.

Gazprom sold $3.8 billion in bonds this year, leading energy companies such as fellow gas producer OAO Novatek to seize on near-record low borrowing costs. Oil and gas accounts for about 50 percent of government budget revenue, while companies in the sector account for about half the weighting of the Micex stock index.

Rosneft said last month it has commitments for $30 billion of loans from international banks. It plans to replace some of the loans with bonds, according to two people with knowledge of the deal. Dow Jones newswires reported Dec. 13 that the company is in talks with overseas energy companies to raise as much as $10 billion in financing for the TNK-BP purchase.

Small Premium

Should Rosneft sell Eurobonds next year, it will probably seek to raise $1 billion to $2 billion, according to Tatiana Dneprovskaya, a fixed income analyst with UralSib Capital in Moscow. The company’s ratio of debt to earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and amortization is approaching 2 and is unlikely to fall significantly in 2013, while Gazprom’s stands at about 1, she said by phone Dec. 13.

Rosneft “is able to service its debt, but in fair pricing it can be reflected in a small premium to Gazprom,” Dneprovskaya said.

Rosneft and Gazprom are both rated Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service, its third-lowest investment-grade level and the same status as the sovereign.

Gazprom’s press service declined to comment on borrowing before the board approves its investment program later this week. Rosneft may raise funds by various means, Vladimir Tyulin, spokesman for Chief Executive Officer Igor Sechin, said in an e- mailed statement.

“Offers are being received from various organizations now,” Tyulin said. “We will pick the ones that are most acceptable and beneficial for the company and its shareholders.”

The ruble weakened 0.7 percent against the dollar, its biggest decline since Oct. 23, to 30.9400 per dollar by the 7 p.m. close in Moscow. Non-deliverable forwards, which provide a guide to expectations of currency movements, showed the ruble declining to 31.4072 per dollar in three months.

Yield Gap

The yield on Russia’s dollar bonds due in April 2020 was little changed at 2.41 percent. The first decline in seven sessions for domestically traded OFZ bonds due in June 2017 pushed up the yield four basis points to 6.54 percent. The yield on Russia’s international ruble bond due in March 2018 added one basis points to 5.74 percent.

Russia is rated BBB by Fitch Ratings, the second-lowest investment-grade ranking. The extra yield investors demand to hold Russian government dollar bonds rather than U.S. Treasuries fell three basis points to 174, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. indexes. The difference compares with 159 basis points for debt of Mexico and 142 basis points for Brazil.

The cost of protecting Russian debt against non-payment for five years using credit-default swaps was steady at 135, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The default swaps cost nine basis points more than Turkey, which is rated one level lower at BBB- by Fitch. The contracts pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a government or company fail to adhere to its debt agreements.

Large Volumes

Rosneft’s decision to tap the markets with a relatively smaller than expected inaugural bond was part of a strategy to lock in low funding costs and match Gazprom’s curve, Apostolos Bantis, a credit analyst at Commerzbank AG, said by phone on Dec. 13.

“There is a great chance that Rosneft will revisit the capital markets early next year given the large volumes of loans it will have to refinance over the course of the next two years,” he said. “Rosneft is likely to take advantage of any windows of opportunity that arise in 2013.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Anna Shiryaevskaya in Moscow at ashiryaevska@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Gavin Serkin at gserkin@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.