Barclays Plc (BARC) said the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s record $470 million in proposed penalties against the bank for alleged power-market manipulation are unjustified and won’t withstand a court challenge.
In filings yesterday with the FERC, Barclays and four of its former traders denied the commission’s charge that they gamed electricity markets in the Western U.S. from late 2006 to 2008 and vowed to fight the allegations in federal court.
The FERC’s allegations are “based on an economically irrational theory,” London-based Barclays said in its 40-page filing. “The commission should terminate this proceeding without any further action.”
When the FERC made the charges against Barclays on Oct. 31, it called for $18 million in penalties on four of its former traders. The bank’s challenge may test the commission’s enforcement powers, which Congress enhanced in 2005 to prevent the type of market manipulation that triggered blackouts in California earlier in the decade.
The agency said one trader, Scott Connelly, led a “manipulative scheme,” and proposed that he pay $15 million, with an additional $1 million each for three colleagues. Connelly’s lawyers disputed the commission’s actions in their filing yesterday.
“This crippling penalty is multiples of Mr. Connelly’s net worth, and it would simply be unjust to impose this penalty that will essentially ruin him and his family for life financially,” the lawyers said. “No federal judge would order such a financial death sentence.”
Barclays didn’t have the intent or the ability to manipulate energy markets and its trading was legitimate, lawyers for the bank said in yesterday’s filing.
The five-member commission should reject its enforcement staff’s recommendations, “decline to assess any penalties and terminate this matter without any further proceedings,” Mark Lane, a Barclays spokesman, said in an e-mail. “If the FERC proceeds, we intend to vigorously defend this matter in federal court.”
FERC Chairman Jon Wellinghoff has said the agency, which has about 200 employees devoted to policing the markets, is in “full enforcement mode.”
Mary O’Driscoll, a FERC spokeswoman, declined to comment.
“We do not comment on ongoing cases,” she said in an e-mail.
To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Wingfield in Washington at email@example.com