China Shipping Rises After Return to Profit: Hong Kong Mover

China Shipping Container Lines Co. (2866), the nation’s second cargo-box carrier, rose the most in more than four months in Hong Kong trading after returning to profit in the third quarter.

China Shipping surged 9 percent to close at HK$2.07, the most since June 11. The Hang Seng Index gained 1 percent.

CSCL posted net income of 991 million yuan ($159 million) in the three months ended Sept. 30, compared with a loss of 951 million yuan a year earlier, the Shanghai-based company said in a statement yesterday. Container lines worked together to maintain rates above break-even levels in the period even as demand for goods from China falls amid Europe’s debt crisis.

“We remain positive on CSCL’s future earning thanks to the industry’s self-discipline,” Lawrence Li, an analyst at UOB Kay Hian Holdings Ltd., wrote in a report. “Cost pressure eased on lower bunker fuel prices” during the period, he said.

CSCL has improved freight rates, boosting Asia-Europe and Transpacific average rates by 85 percent year-on-year and 58 percent year-on-year respectively, according to Li.

Larger rival China Cosco Holdings Co. (1919), which also operates dry-bulk ships, narrowed its third-quarter loss to 1.53 billion yuan from 2.07 billion yuan.

The Tianjin, China-based shipping company said it may post a full-year net loss on “imbalances between supply and demand, low dry bulk freight rates” and higher costs.

China Cosco shares rose 4.9 percent to close at HK$3.85.

Container lines, including CSCL and China Cosco, have also agreed to raise rates on Asia-U.S. west coast routes by $400 per forty-foot box starting Dec. 1, according to a statement yesterday from the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement, a shipping group.

To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Alexandra Ho in Shanghai at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Neil Denslow at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.