Standard Chartered Probe Said to Require Up to $700 Mln

Standard Chartered Plc (STAN) might be asked to pay as much as $700 million to resolve money-laundering allegations filed by New York’s banking superintendent after his department grew impatient with inaction by federal regulators, a person familiar with the case said.

Benjamin Lawsky, who heads up New York’s Department of Financial Services, tried unsuccessfully a few months ago to get U.S. regulators to punish the London-based bank for conduct involving disguised Iranian money transfers, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential. The transfers have been under investigation by federal agencies for more than two years, according to Lawsky’s Aug. 6 order.

A settlement of $700 million would match the amount that HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) set aside last month after a Senate committee found the bank gave terrorists, drug cartels and criminals access to the U.S. financial system. A payment of that sum by HSBC would be the largest paid by any bank so far.

Other foreign banks that have resolved allegations of executing wire transfers on behalf of sanctioned nations or groups include Barclays Plc (BARC), Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN), Lloyds Banking Group Plc and ABN AMRO Group NV. In each of these cases, the settlements involved joint investigations by regulators.

Photographer: Jerome Favre/Bloomberg

The Standard Chartered Plc. logo is displayed outside the company's headquarters in Hong Kong. Close

The Standard Chartered Plc. logo is displayed outside the company's headquarters in Hong Kong.

Close
Open
Photographer: Jerome Favre/Bloomberg

The Standard Chartered Plc. logo is displayed outside the company's headquarters in Hong Kong.

Bigger Lenders

A large fine and loss of a banking license could result in Standard Chartered (2888) becoming a takeover target for bigger lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., that want a larger presence in emerging markets, Jon Kirk, a partner of financials research at Redburn Partners LLP, said in a note to clients.

Standard Chartered rose 7.1 percent to 1,315.50 pence at 4:35 p.m. in London trading today.

Lawsky’s decision to move forward alone is unusual, said Jimmy Gurule, a former Treasury Department undersecretary for enforcement who now teaches at the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana.

“In the past six to seven cases involving institutions violating U.S. sanctions, this is the only one where a regulator acted unilaterally,” he said.

Lawsky’s agency notified federal and local regulators and prosecutors about his order, the person familiar with the matter said. David Neustadt, a spokesman for the Department of Financial Services, or DFS, declined to comment on the reasons for Lawsky’s actions.

‘Work Together’

Bank of England Governor Mervyn King criticized Lawsky’s order, saying U.K. authorities would “ask that various regulatory bodies that are investigating a particular case try to work together.” London Mayor Boris Johnson said a “desire to root out wrongdoing” shouldn’t “become an excuse for protectionism.”

Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg

According to the order filed by Lawsky on Aug. 6, executives at Standard Chartered’s London headquarters adopted a policy to strip out the names of Iranian entities that needed to clear U.S. dollar payments from 2001 to 2007, so that U.S. bank overseers wouldn’t be aware of the Iranian connection. Close

According to the order filed by Lawsky on Aug. 6, executives at Standard Chartered’s... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg

According to the order filed by Lawsky on Aug. 6, executives at Standard Chartered’s London headquarters adopted a policy to strip out the names of Iranian entities that needed to clear U.S. dollar payments from 2001 to 2007, so that U.S. bank overseers wouldn’t be aware of the Iranian connection.

On a conference call today, Standard Chartered Chief Executive Officer Peter Sands denied that the bank broke U.S. anti-money laundering laws, saying it “has always tried to comply with U.S. sanctions.”

A hearing over whether the bank’s license to operate in New York should be revoked is slated for Aug. 15. The bank is represented by attorney H. Rodgin Cohen of New York-based Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, the person familiar with the case said.

Lawsky was willing to break ranks with national regulators on the Standard Chartered probe, including the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, because of e-mails that surfaced in the investigation, said the person familiar with the case.

Stripping Out

According to the order filed by Lawsky on Aug. 6, executives at Standard Chartered’s London headquarters adopted a policy to strip out the names of Iranian entities that needed to clear U.S. dollar payments from 2001 to 2007, so that U.S. bank overseers wouldn’t be aware of the Iranian connection.

Lawsky alleged in the order that Standard Chartered executed 60,000 wire transfers, amounting to $250 billion, on behalf of Iranian financial institutions during that period.

In its response to Lawsky’s order, the bank said its own review of those transactions, conducted by Promontory Financial Group, showed that 99.9 percent of those transfers complied with existing rules regarding so-called “U-turn” transactions involving sanctioned nations. Sands said today that none of the transactions reviewed by the bank were linked to terrorist organizations.

OFAC required U.S. banks to identify and filter all dollar- clearing transactions involving financial institutions operating in nations facing U.S. sanctions, including Iran -- even if the transactions were handled by third-party banks.

Terror Organizations

The goal, according to the Treasury, was to prevent U.S. dollars from being used to finance terrorist organizations and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

When the head of Standard Chartered’s U.S. unit warned his superiors in London in 2006 that the bank’s actions could expose it to “catastrophic reputational damage,” he received a reply referring to U.S. employees with an obscenity, according to Lawsky’s order.

“Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we’re not going to deal with Iranians?” a bank superior in London said, according to the order.

Standard Chartered’s position appears to be consistent with the view of the U.S. Treasury Department’s OFAC department.

In order to meet regulatory requirements, the New York branch executing the transaction wasn’t required to be notified by the parent that it was doing so on behalf of an Iranian entity, said John Sullivan, the Treasury Department spokesman responsible for terrorism and financial intelligence.

Federal Reserve

Sullivan declined to discuss any further details about the probe of Standard Chartered. Barbara Hagenbaugh, a spokeswoman for the Federal Reserve, declined to comment on Lawsky’s order, saying only that the central bank has been working with OFAC and other law enforcement agencies on matters related to Iran and “other sanctioned entities.”

Standard Chartered is also being investigated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Justice Department and the Manhattan District Attorney, the bank said in a statement.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is also reviewing the wire transfers, said a person familiar with the investigation who asked not to be identified because the probe is active.

The Treasury Department’s defense of Standard Chartered’s conduct seemed to puzzle Gurule.

“You’d think the federal government would be defending national security interests first,” he said. “It appears to be the state that’s taking the lead to protect the nation’s broader interests.”

Bank’s Defense

Gurule also questioned the bank’s defense of its conduct as being in technical compliance with the law, given that e-mails show an apparent effort to disguise the parties involved in the wire transfers.

“There’s clearly intent to conceal here, which is inconsistent with the bank’s defense that these transactions were lawful,” he said.

The allegations against Standard Chartered are the latest in a series of regulatory transgressions by the New York offices of British banks.

In 2009, a unit of London-based Lloyds accused of allowing Iran illegal access to the U.S. financial system agreed to pay $350 million to settle an investigation by then-Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau.

In August 2010, Barclays agreed to pay $298 million to settle claims it violated trade laws by facilitating transactions involving banks from countries under U.S. sanctions including Cuba, Iran, Libya and Sudan.

HSBC, also based on London, last month made its $700 million provision for U.S. fines after a Senate committee hearing. That sum may increase, CEO Stuart Gulliver has said.

Qaddafi Ouster

Standard Chartered’s financial risk might also increase.

Lawsky’s agency, according to the Aug. 6 order, is investigating wire transfers executed by Standard Chartered’s New York branch on behalf of other U.S.-sanctioned countries, including Myanmar and Sudan and Libya, before the ouster of Muammar Qaddafi. Resolution of money laundering allegations regarding those nations may add to the cost of any Iran-related settlement, the person familiar with the matter said.

The DFS was created in 2011 when New York’s Banking Department and Insurance Department were abolished, with their functions and authority transferred to the new regulator, under Lawsky. The agency has the power to issue regulations, investigate and fine financial services companies. It may also probe alleged criminal activity and refer its findings to the state’s attorney general for prosecution.

Analyst Prediction

Cormac Leech, an analyst at London-based Liberum Capital Ltd. who rates the stock a buy, predicted in a note to investors yesterday that the bank may be fined $1.5 billion by U.S. regulators, lose about $1 billion of revenue from its Iranian operation and a further $3 billion in market value if senior managers quit.

Standard Chartered opened its Iran office in 1993. Ten years later, the lender said “cross-border trade flows with markets like Turkey, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran appear to be growing and offer potential to us.” The bank stopped all new business in Iran in May 2007 and pulled out totally in May 2012.

To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Farrell in New York at gregfarrell@bloomberg.net; Meera Louis in Washington at mlouis1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net; Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.