Convicted Accountant Parse Seeks New Trial for Tax Fraud

David Parse, an accountant convicted in what a judge called the biggest U.S. tax-fraud prosecution in history, is seeking a new trial on the grounds that his lawyers were inadequate.

U.S. District Judge William Pauley in June granted a new trial for Parse’s three codefendants, after a juror disclosed she had lied about her past including that she was an alcoholic and a suspended attorney. Pauley let Parse’s conviction stand, ruling that his lawyers, from the New York firm Brune & Richard LLP, failed to reveal information they had about the juror, Catherine Conrad, whom Pauley called a “pathological liar.”

“As the court found, a reasonably competent lawyer on learning that Juror No. 1 might be a suspended lawyer with a history of alcoholism would have taken some action to resolve the issue,” Parse said in court papers filed today in Manhattan federal court. “Choosing to do nothing was not a viable option.”

In May 2011, the jury including Conrad returned guilty verdicts against Paul Daugerdas and Donna Guerin, former Jenkens & Gilchrist lawyers; Denis Field, the former chief executive officer at accounting firm BDO Seidman LLP; and Parse, who worked for Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) unit Alex. Brown. Craig Brubaker, a second former Alex. Brown accountant, was found not guilty.

Pauley ruled that Conrad’s presence on the jury deprived Parse’s codefendants of a fair trial. Parse’s lawyers waived the issue by failing to alert the court of information it had about Conrad, he ruled.

The 10-week tax fraud trial included 9,200 pages of testimony from 41 witnesses. Lawyers introduced 1,300 pieces of evidence.

The case is U.S. v. Daugerdas, 09-CR-581, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in New York at; David Glovin in New York at;

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.