Cubist Sues Hospira Over Cubicin Bacteria Medicine Patent

Cubist Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CBST), a maker of antibiotic medicines, sued Hospira Inc. (HSP) for patent infringement over plans to market a generic version of Cubicin, a drug used to combat the MRSA flesh-eating bacterium.

Hospira, based in Lake Forest, Illinois, has applied to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for permission to sell a copy of Cubicin before to the 2020 expiration of Lexington, Massachusetts-based Cubist’s patent, according to a complaint filed yesterday in federal court in Wilmington, Delaware.

Cubist contends in court papers that Hospira lawyers wrongly claim the patent is “invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture” of generic Cubicin.

The injectable antibiotic is being used for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, which doesn’t respond to conventional medicines.

MRSA infections are commonly spread by direct contact with a skin infection or items such as towels or bandages that have had contact with an infection, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.

Cubist asked a judge for a ruling of infringement and an order to stop Hospira from selling the generic version of the drug until it loses patent protection.

“Hospira is committed to bringing high-quality, lower- priced generic alternatives to the market,” said Daniel Rosenberg, a company spokesman, in an e-mailed message.

Shares of Cubist fell 44 cents, or 1.1 percent, to $39.01 in Nasdaq Stock Market trading in New York at 4 p.m.

The case is Cubist Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Hospira Inc., 12-cv-859, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).

To see the patent, click: 8,129,342.

To contact the reporters on this story: Phil Milford in Wilmington, Delaware, at; Dawn McCarty in Wilmington, Delaware, at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.