In the U.K., a record fine for Barclays Plc (BARC) has triggered outrage from lawmakers and forced resignations from the bank’s top executives. In the U.S., Wall Street’s defenders in Congress are sticking by the industry, undaunted by the Barclays fine or trading losses of more than $2 billion at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)
While the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives have held hearings on JPMorgan and lawmakers have started to pay attention to allegations that banks including Barclays may have colluded to set interest rates, November’s presidential election and partisan gridlock have left little opening for legislative moves affecting banks including New York-based JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corp.
“In terms of legislative calendar, it’s late in the clock and there’s not a lot to be done here pre-election,” Mark Calabria, a former Republican Senate Banking Committee aide, said in a telephone interview. “Regardless of what happens at JPMorgan, Congress is leaving at the beginning of August barring the financial system itself actually collapsing. And even then, Congress would probably still take a recess.”
Through two high-profile hearings with JPMorgan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon, lawmakers’ ideological and policy fault lines remained bright and unmoved. Some House and Senate Democrats, including Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, used the New York-based bank’s $2 billion trading loss as ammunition in the fight for tighter regulations on Wall Street and funding increases for their federal overseers.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Act polarizes the parties and the presidential candidates. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, has pledged to repeal Dodd-Frank. President Barack Obama cites the law as one of the cornerstone achievements of his first term in office.
Republicans, meanwhile, have seized on losses by JPMorgan’s chief investment office as evidence that Dodd-Frank puts too much reliance on regulators who were unable to detect the risks that led to the losses. They also argue that JPMorgan shouldn’t serve as a whipping boy because, unlike the 2008 financial crisis, the bank required no federal bailout after the losses were disclosed in May.
“This is how the system is supposed to work,” Representative Spencer Bachus, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said in his opening statement of the panel’s June 19 hearing with Dimon. “Those who take the risks are the ones who suffer the loss or realize the gain.”
That doesn’t mean lawmakers don’t have legislative options. Members of both parties in the House and Senate have introduced measures to make a broad spectrum of changes to how Wall Street does business, from shrinking the largest banks and barring bank officials from serving on the boards of regional Federal Reserve banks, to repealing or loosening portions of the Dodd-Frank Act’s restrictions on the trading of derivatives.
The Republican-led Financial Services panel has churned bills to make changes to Dodd-Frank and has scheduled five hearings in July to examine the impact of the law on various sectors of the marketplace.
Still, in an election year with a looming “fiscal cliff” -- a raft of expiring tax provisions paired with the beginning of $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts over a decade -- proposed changes to Wall Street’s rules are expected to languish, according to Edward Mills, a financial analyst at Arlington, Virginia-based FBR Capital Markets.
“Congress responds to crisis and deadline,” Mills, a former Democratic aide on banking and financial services issues in the House and Senate, said in a telephone interview. “Absent a crisis we’re not going to see anything and the only real deadline on the horizon is the fiscal cliff issue at the end of the year.”
Wall Street’s financial influence -- political action committees from the securities and investment industry have contributed $6.7 million to lawmakers in the 2012 cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics -- may also play a role as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle look for a financial advantage in the final months of their campaigns, said Calabria, who is now director of financial regulations studies at the Washington-based Cato Institute, which promotes free markets.
In the presidential race, Romney, the former head of Bain Capital LLC, has swung the financial support from the securities and investment industry heavily in his favor, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The Republican has collected $9.4 million from the industry, while Obama, whose campaign has focused in part on Romney’s career in private equity, has pulled in $3.4 million.
In the House Republican legislative agenda through August, which Majority Leader Eric Cantor circulated to members in May, a vote on a measure to audit the Federal Reserve was the lone piece of legislation scheduled to be considered by the chamber.
In the Senate, Republicans Mike Crapo of Idaho and Mike Johanns of Nebraska have tried multiple times to push an amendment that would bar regulators from imposing margin, or collateral, requirements to manufacturers and commercial users of swaps. Senate leaders did not bring the measure, which is among seven bills making changes to Dodd-Frank already passed by the House, up for a vote after it was filed as an amendment to the recently passed farm bill.
That has left measures funding federal regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as the last legislative vehicles. Frank, the senior Democrat on the Financial Services panel, has used the JPMorgan losses and Barclays Plc’s record $451 million fine after the bank admitted it submitted false London and euro interbank offering rates, to bolster his case for more funding.
Political pressure from the probe cost Barclays’ chief executive, Robert Diamond, the architect of the company’s banking expansion, his job today. Barclays, in a statement, said Diamond will step down immediately. Diamond, 60, was followed by Chief Operating Officer Jerry Del Missier, who also also stepped down today. Marcus Agius, who said yesterday he planned to resign as chairman, will lead the search for a new CEO before leaving, the bank said.
Diamond resigned a day after the government announced a parliamentary inquiry into the U.K. banking industry. He is due to be questioned by British lawmakers on the Treasury Select Committee tomorrow. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne welcomed Diamond’s resignation, telling BBC Radio 4 today he hoped it would be the first step toward a “new culture of responsibility” in British banking.
Barclays pledged to pay $200 million to the CFTC, $160 million to the Department of Justice, and 59.5 million pounds ($91 million) to the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority. The fines were the largest in the history of the CFTC and FSA.
“The CFTC’s success in uncovering the outrageous manipulation of the Libor, and the consequent settlement which will bring to the U.S. Treasury hundreds of millions of dollars, demonstrates the value of that agency,” Frank said in a June 29 statement.
Citigroup Inc. (C), Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, UBS AG (UBSN), ICAP Plc (IAP), Lloyds Banking Group Plc (LLOY) and Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) are among the firms regulators are investigating. A total of 18 banks are surveyed as part of the process of determining Libor and related rates.
U.S. Senate Democrats are seeking to increase the budget of the main financial-markets regulators in spending plans that clash with House Republicans’ efforts to cut funds and rein in the reach of Obama’s financial regulation law.
For lawmakers out of legislative options, the nearest avenue to have an impact on the rules may be the regulators, who have fallen behind in drafting and implementing that hundreds of rules required by Dodd-Frank, according to a recent report from Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP.
Of the 221 rulemaking deadlines that have passed, 140, or 63 percent, have been missed. Regulators have not yet released proposals for 19 of the 140 missed rules, the firm said in its July 2 report. That has opened the door for lawmakers to put pressure on regulators to move closer to their respective visions of financial regulation.
Two subcommittee chairmen from the Financial Services committee, Representatives Scott Garrett of New Jersey and Randy Neugebauer of Texas, pressed CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler in a June 20 letter to propose a rule on the international reach of swaps regulations instead of the informal guidance the agency eventually released on June 29. The lawmakers, who have pushed for the CFTC to reduce the reach of the new regulations, asked for a rule, which would require cost-benefit analysis.
Merkley, the Oregon Democrat, has used the JPMorgan losses as ammunition in his continued effort to tighten the implementation of the pending ban on proprietary trading, or so-called Volcker rule, included in Dodd-Frank. Merkley, a co-author of the provision and member of the Senate Banking Committee, has pressed Dimon and federal regulators on the rule since the bank’s losses were first disclosed.
“It is high time that regulators put forward an airtight Volcker Rule to give taxpayers, shareholders, and, frankly, the banks themselves the certainty that banks are in the business of extending credit to Main Street America, and not in the business of making high-risk, hedge fund-like bets in London,” Merkley said in a June 28 statement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Phil Mattingly in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Maura Reynolds at email@example.com