Credit-market investors are treating Lexmark International Inc. (LXK) like a junk-bond issuer as the maker of laser and inkjet printers for businesses struggles to sell its equipment in an increasingly paperless world.
Lexmark’s bonds and credit-default swaps tied to its debt imply the market perceives a credit rating of Ba1, according to Moody’s Corp.’s capital markets research group, compared with its actual rating at Moody’s Investors Service of Baa3. The swaps have surged to the highest level since 2009, according to prices compiled by Bloomberg.
The perception of creditworthiness of Lexmark, spun off in 1991 by International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), which Standard & Poor’s upgraded to AA- from A+ on May 30, is deteriorating as investors grow leery of its prospects. The Lexington, Kentucky- based company is trying to become a provider of corporate printer services and document management, a strategy that hasn’t paid off as the decline in its traditional business outweighs contributions from new areas.
“Lexmark is in a mature-to-declining industry with a weakening position, which is pressuring profitability,” said Joel Levington, managing director of corporate credit at Brookfield Investment Management Inc. in New York. “I personally do not believe the business is worthy of investment- grade status.”
Credit markets agree. Swaps on the company’s debt have surged since April, adding 92 basis points to 338 basis points today, Bloomberg prices show. That means investors would pay $338,000 annually to protect $10 million of Lexmark’s debt.
The contracts have jumped 149 basis points since June 1, 2011. Credit swaps, which typically fall as investor confidence improves and rise as it deteriorates, pay the buyer face value if a borrower fails to meet its obligations, less the value of the defaulted debt.
Lexmark’s $300 million of 6.65 percent bonds due June 2018, which traded as high as 115 cents on the dollar in April, have fallen to 112.1 cents on the dollar where they yield 4.34 percent, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
That’s closer to the 4.46 percent Bloomberg Fair Market yield for seven-year, BB rated industrial bonds than the 3.19 percent on BBB- debt of that maturity.
The bonds’ implied Baa3 grade matched the Moody’s rating through May 24. S&P rates the debt BBB-, Bloomberg data show.
The company, which has sold printers to consumers through retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Best Buy Co. and Target Corp., is trying to develop a managed print services business, contracts under which it provides all the printing needs of a corporation or government agency. That strategy made for a “mixed” year in 2011 for Lexmark, according to Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.
“While the company has developed a healthy and growing managed print services business and begun to diversify into software, its inkjet business has continued to struggle and its financial results have been undermined by continued decline in its legacy supplies business,” Sacconaghi said on a conference call from the Sanford C. Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference on May 31.
“It’s a bit of a headwind we’re fighting as far as getting overall growth,” Chief Executive Officer Paul Rooke said in a telephone interview. “We’ve come a long way from where we were.”
Lexmark’s leverage, as measured by the ratio of its debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization was 0.98 times at the end of the first quarter, down from 1.47 times at the end of June 2009, Bloomberg data show.
Cash and marketable securities fell $200 million from the end of 2011 to $949 million because of acquisitions. The company has about $650 million of long-term debt, with $350 million maturing in 2013 and the rest in 2018, Bloomberg data show. Lexmark’s revenue is expected to fall to $4 billion in 2012 and $3.9 billion next year from $4.17 billion in 2011, according to the average estimate of nine analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.
Lexmark was the printer division of IBM until 1991, when it sold the unit for $1.5 billion to Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLC, according to Hoover’s Inc. Clayton Dubilier sold it to the public at $20 a share in 1995, valuing the company at $1.78 billion, Bloomberg data show.
IBM, which has been emphasizing software and services over hardware, was upgraded at S&P because of its shift to these “more stable and higher margin” businesses, S&P’s analyst Martha Toll-Reed said in a report.
Lexmark plans to return more than half of free cash flow to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, Rooke said in a conference call from the Sanford C. Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference with analysts on May 31.
Lexmark gave $268 million back to shareholders last year via stock purchases and dividends, more than its $234.5 million of free cash flow, and in the first quarter this year repurchased $30 million of shares and paid a dividend of 25 cents a share, or about $18 million.
Free cash not destined for shareholder rewards will be used to “invest for growth, both organically and with a focus on acquisitions to drive long-term shareholder value,” Rooke said on the conference call.
The company’s shares dropped 6.5 percent on April 24 to $30.44 after it reported quarterly adjusted earnings of 84 cents a share, lower than the $1.08 average analyst estimate in a Bloomberg survey. The stock has erased 24 percent of its market capitalization this year, closing at $24.98 on June 1.
“Lexmark is in the midst of a strategic shift to higher usage workgroup printers and more profitable supplies sales, but, in our opinion, the company remains vulnerable to economic cycles and pricing pressure,” Toll-Reed and Philip Schrank, another S&P analyst, wrote in an April 30 note affirming the company’s BBB- rating and “stable” outlook.
The analysts wrote the outlook would be “negative” if Lexmark’s profitability consistently declines or if its financial policies become more aggressive, “with sustained leverage in excess of the low” 2 times areas.
Hewlett-Packard Co., the world’s largest personal-computer maker, is consolidating its PC and printer business, and the Palo Alto, California-based company will look to reclaim market share Lexmark gained, according to Mark Moskowitz, a San Francisco-based analyst at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
As global growth slows as consumers and governments cut spending to stem Europe’s sovereign debt crisis, competition will heat up, he said.
“In an environment where we could be setting up for another macro tailspin, you can bet for sure that printing is going back to the bottom rung,” Moskowitz said in a telephone interview. “Within six to nine months, you’re going to hear about a bloodbath in printing.”
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Alan Goldstein at firstname.lastname@example.org