Bank Pay Standards Need Stronger Implementation Effort, FSB Says

Regulators in the Group of 20 nations must work harder to implement international guidelines on executive compensation for bankers, according to the Financial Stability Board.

The FSB’s standards on aligning pay with “prudent” risk- taking are the “most challenging” for regulators to impose, the board said yesterday in a report. Authorities differ over how best to tie pay to performance while nations including Brazil, China and Japan don’t see compensation practices as “significant sources of risk,” according to the report.

The board is overseeing the world’s regulators as they grapple with new standards for executive pay that seek to reduce the risk of another financial crisis. Compensation practices at large financial institutions were a “key contributing factor” to the crisis, the FSB said in the report.

“Many national authorities have taken the necessary regulatory actions, supervisory oversight has intensified, and the governance of compensation schemes at firms has improved,” the board said. “Despite these considerable strides, more work is necessary to achieve sound compensation practices.”

Barclays Plc (BARC) investors protested last week as 27 percent of shareholders voted against Chief Executive Officer Robert Diamond’s 12 million-pound ($19.5 million) compensation package. Citigroup Inc. (C) investors rejected CEO Vikram Pandit’s $15 million pay last month while about a third of Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) shareholders opposed that bank’s plan.

‘Substantial Portion’

Regulators have taken different approaches to implementing FSB standards that cover variable pay and deferred compensation. The board recommends that a “substantial portion” of bank executives’ compensation should be based on individual and firm- wide performance. Lenders also should stagger pay through deferral arrangements over a period of years.

Some regulators, including those in the U.K., France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Singapore, have incorporated these standards as minimum requirements. Regulators in the U.S., Japan, Australia, Canada and Hong Kong have given banks more flexibility because of their “business models and risk profiles,” according to the FBS.

The board said it had put in place a procedure allowing banks to complain, via their national authorities, when competitors in another country don’t fully apply the rules.

“More work is necessary to overcome constraints to full implementation by individual national authorities and to address concerns by firms of an uneven playing field,” the FSB said in an e-mailed statement.

To contact the reporters on this story: Jim Brunsden in Brussels at; Donal Griffin in New York at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: David E. Rovella at; David Scheer at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.