Moody’s Upgrades Foster’s to Baa1 After SABMiller Acquisition

Moody’s Investors Service raised its rating of Foster’s Group Ltd. by one level to Baa1, its third-lowest investment-grade, following the acquisition by SABMiller Plc. (SAB)

“The benefits of SABMiller’s ownership and wider expertise in the global beer markets is likely to positively impact Foster’s business model,” Ian Lewis, a Moody’s senior credit officer, said in a report today. “A number of Foster’s older beer brands, which have had declining earnings and share, such as VB and Crown Lager will be re-invigorated.”

Standard & Poor’s earlier this month also upgraded Melbourne-based Foster’s by one level to BBB+ after London-based SABMiller completed the A$10.5 billion ($10.9 billion) acquisition in December.

Foster’s Chief Executive Officer Ari Mervis said at an investor conference in London in March that SABMiller plans to increase profit margins at the Australian beermaker and carve out greater-than-expected cost savings from the deal.

Credit-default swaps insuring the debt of Foster’s against non-payment rose 1 basis point to 66 basis points as of 10:49 a.m. in Sydney, according to prices from Westpac Banking Corp. (WBC)

The swaps have fallen 25 basis points since Dec. 1, when Foster’s gained shareholder backing for the takeover offer, according to data provider CMA, which is owned by CME Group Inc. and compiles prices quoted by dealers in the privately negotiated market.

The contracts, which typically climb as investor confidence deteriorates and decrease as it improves, pay the buyer face value if a borrower fails to meet its obligations, less the value of the defaulted debt. A basis point equals $1,000 annually on a contract protecting $10 million of debt.

To contact the reporters on this story: Tanya Angerer in Singapore at; Taejin Park in Seoul at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Shelley Smith at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.