Broadcom Wins Tentative Ban on Infringing Emulex Products

Broadcom Corp. (BRCM) won a tentative ruling prohibiting rival chipmaker Emulex Corp. (ELX) from selling so- called controller chips for communications networks that were found to infringe two Broadcom patents.

U.S. District Judge James Selna in Santa Ana, California, issued a tentative decision before a hearing today on Broadcom’s request for a permanent injunction. The judge said he would allow Emulex to sell the infringing products for another 18 months to existing customers who have ordered them, while paying Broadcom a 3 percent royalty.

At the hearing, Selna said he would issue a final ruling on Broadcom’s request next week.

The judge had found last year that Emulex infringed two of Irvine, California-based Broadcom’s patents. Emulex, based in Costa Mesa, California, objected to a court-ordered ban of sales of infringing products and asked for a mandatory royalty instead.

Juanita Brooks, a lawyer for Emulex, said at today’s hearing that “incredible market disruptions” would occur if the judge would enter an injunction. She asked Selna to “not carve it out in such a way so the public should suffer because of a war between Broadcom and Emulex.”

Bill Lee, a lawyer for Broadcom, asked the judge to triple the royalty rate Emulex will have to pay Broadcom during the 18- month “sunset” period.

The case is Emulex v. Broadcom, 09-01310, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Santa Ana).

To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in Los Angeles at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.