Vigilant Insurance Wins Appeal Court’s Dismissal of Bear Stearns N.Y. Suit

Chubb Corp. (CB)’s Vigilant Insurance unit won the dismissal of a lawsuit in which Bear Stearns Cos. accused the insurer of breaching a contract by refusing to pay part of a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission settlement.

Bear Stearns in March 2006 agreed to pay $250 million to settle regulators’ claims it was at the center of a system for clients to break mutual-fund trading rules. The accord comprised $160 million in wrongful profit and a $90 million civil penalty.

Bear Stearns, which was bought by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) in 2008, demanded that Vigilant indemnify it for the $160 million in profit. The insurer refused on the ground that the payment wasn’t an insurable loss or was excluded from coverage.

A state appeals court in Manhattan today granted Vigilant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. It reversed a September 2010 ruling by Justice Charles Ramos of state Supreme Court. Disgorgement of “ill-gotten gains or restitutionary damages” are not insurable under state law, the appeals court said.

“The public-policy rationale for this rule is that the deterrent effect of a disgorgement action would be greatly undermined if wrongdoers were permitted to shift the cost of disgorgement to an insurer,” Justice Richard T. Andrias wrote for the court.

Jennifer Zuccarelli, a JPMorgan spokeswoman, didn’t immediately return a telephone call seeking comment on the ruling.

The case is J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co., 600979/2009, New York State Supreme Court (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Dolmetsch in New York at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.