Guggenheim Partners Is Said to Hire Bankers for Sale of Claymore ETF Unit

Guggenheim Partners LLC is seeking buyers for Claymore Investments, the Canadian provider of exchange-traded funds it acquired two years ago, said people with knowledge of the matter.

Guggenheim hired JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Royal Bank of Canada to find buyers, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the effort is private. The unit, which had $6.8 billion of assets under management as of Oct. 31, may fetch several hundred million dollars in a sale, the people said.

Guggenheim acquired the business through its purchase of Claymore Group LLC, announced in July 2009 and completed later that year. In 2010, when it rebranded Claymore’s U.S.-registered funds and business units under the Guggenheim name, Toronto- based Claymore Investments kept its brand.

Jeffrey Kelley, a spokesman for Guggenheim, declined to comment.

Claymore Investments, founded in 2005 and run by Chief Executive Officer Som Seif, claims on its website to have produced several “firsts” for the industry, including the first actively managed ETF, the first ETF to invest in the so- called BRIC nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China, and the first to offer an investment in physical gold with a Canadian dollar hedge.

Claymore’s $6.6 billion in ETF assets under management as of Oct. 31 amounts to 16 percent of the Canadian market, according to data compiled by BlackRock Inc. (BLK) Only BlackRock’s iShares unit is bigger, with $28.5 billion.

Guggenheim, founded in 2000 with backing from the Guggenheim family, is based in Chicago and New York and oversees more than $125 billion in customer assets, according to the company’s website.

To contact the reporters on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net; Christopher Condon in Boston at ccondon4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jennifer Sondag at jsondag@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.