Law Firms Profits Per Partner May Be Overstated 20%, WSJ Reports

More than half of the top 50 U.S. law firms may have overstated their profits per partner, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing an industry analysis prepared by a unit of Citigroup Inc.

About 22 percent of the top firms overstated the measure by more than 20 percent last year, the newspaper reported today, citing an unidentified person briefed on the analysis by Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group. Citigroup disclosed the findings earlier this month in a meeting with law firm managing partners and chairmen in Armonk, New York, the paper said.

American Lawyer magazine ranks profits per partner annually in May. The measure, which divides net operating income by the number of equity partners at a firm, is the most commonly used gauge to determine the health of the $100 billion global corporate law firm industry, the newspaper reported.

American Lawyer, which is published by ALM Media Properties LLC, reported in May that profits per partner at the 100 largest law firms rose 8.4 percent to an average of about $1.4 million last year, the newspaper reported. Citigroup’s analysis found that 16 percent of the firms overstated their numbers by 10 percent to 20 percent, it said. An additional 15 percent of the firms had figures that were inflated by 5 percent to 10 percent, the Journal said.

Robin Sparkman, American Lawyer’s editor in chief, said the magazine stands behind its published ranking and report.

“Like all good journalists, we are eager to correct errors when we get better data, which we have not yet seen from Citi,” Sparkman said by e-mail. “We ask only to be judged on what we report, rather than on second- and third-hand accounts about figures that none of us can independently confirm.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Sophia Pearson in Philadelphia at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.