Lawmakers Propose One-Year Holiday on Repatriating Profits

A senior Republican tax writer on the House Ways and Means Committee is introducing legislation that would give U.S. companies one year to bring home at a lower tax rate as much as $1 trillion in profits parked overseas.

The bill’s lead author, Texas Republican Representative Kevin Brady, who introduced the bill with some Democratic support, describes the proposal as a jobs measure. The proposal, which repeats a 2004 law, would allow U.S.-based companies, for one year, to repatriate income earned overseas at a 5.25 percent rate, instead of the 35 percent statutory corporate rate.

Companies including Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Devon Energy Corp. (DVN), Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) and Brown-Forman Corp. (BF/A) are part of a coalition lobbying for a repatriation holiday.

“This is about creating jobs, expanding U.S. businesses and strengthening American companies,” Brady said in a statement today.

The bill includes a penalty for companies that bring home profits at a lower rate and then reduce their workforce. Companies would have to add $25,000 to their taxable income each time they cut their total workforce below the company’s average.

With a 35 percent tax rate, the provision would increase the company’s tax bill by $8,750 for each job cut.

Facing Obstacles

The bill faces obstacles in Congress. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, supports a repatriation bill while Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, has said he wants to address the issue only as part of a comprehensive rewrite of the tax code. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has echoed Camp’s view.

Cantor expressed support today for considering a repatriation proposal before a tax overhaul.

“While fundamental reform will take time, repatriation is an interim step that we can take to encourage businesses to bring investment back to our country,” he said in a statement.

The repatriation issue has received less attention in the Senate. The Obama administration opposes a repatriation holiday.

Critics maintain that the 2004 repatriation holiday didn’t lead to enough job creation to justify the tax break.

“It was a major failure the first time around, and it’s going to be worse this time,” said Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington organization that supports policies that help low- income Americans. “You make it a regular occurrence, you make it an incentive to shift profits and investments overseas.”

The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that a repatriation holiday similar to the one Brady introduced would cost the government $78.7 billion in forgone revenue, according to an analysis released today by Representative Lloyd Doggett, a Texas Democrat.

Brady introduced the bill with at least three Democratic co-sponsors -- Representatives Jim Cooper of Tennessee, Jim Matheson of Utah and Jared Polis of Colorado.

To contact the reporters on this story: Steven Sloan in Washington at; Richard Rubin in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.