Deutsche Bank, Standard & Poor’s Must Face Anschutz Claims

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Standard & Poor’s must face claims in a lawsuit brought by the Anschutz Corp. seeking damages over its purchase of auction-rate securities, a judge ruled.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco yesterday refused to throw out Anschutz’s claims of market manipulation and fraud against Deutsche Bank and negligent misrepresentation against S&P, according to a March 27 ruling.

Banks running periodic auctions abandoned the $330 billion market for the securities in 2008 amid the fallout from the subprime market slump. Investors were stuck with the products. Denver-based Anschutz in 2007 bought $40 million of the securities underwritten and rated by the defendants, the ruling said.

“The case is without merit and we will defend ourselves vigorously,” Edward Sweeney, a spokesman for S&P, said in a statement.

In a separate lawsuit over auction rate securities, a federal judge in San Francisco today conditionally granted Deutsche Bank Securities’ request to dismiss claims by Louisiana Pacific Corp. while giving the building products company an opportunity to revise its lawsuit.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White gave Nashville, Tennessee-based Louisiana Pacific until April 29 to amend its case or face dismissal of most of the lawsuit, which seeks to recover damages from its $300 million purchase of auction-rate securities, according to a court filing.

Elizabeth Frolich, an attorney for Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank, had no immediate comment.

The first case is Anschutz v. Merrill Lynch, 09-3780, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco). The second case is Louisiana Pacific v Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer, 09-3529, U.S. District Court, San Francisco.

To contact the reporters on this story: Karen Gullo in San Francisco at

To contact the editor responsible for this report: David E. Rovella at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.