Credit Suisse Hires Alva as Head of Health-Care M&A
Stock Chart for Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN)
(Corrects spelling of Lipsky in sixth paragraph.)
Credit Suisse AG hired a new head of its health-care mergers and acquisitions business, naming former Lazard Ltd. managing director Rajesh Alva to the role, as it continues to add bankers to the group.
The hiring of Alva, 41, was announced in a Credit Suisse memo confirmed by Duncan King, a spokesman for the bank. Alva left Lazard in May after 15 years with the firm, including the last seven years as managing director and head of the medical- technology group. He’ll be based in New York.
Credit Suisse, based in Zurich, is second in global health- care deals this year at about $42 billion, behind Goldman Sachs Group Inc., according to Bloomberg data. It added Eric Hecht, a former health-care equity analyst and adviser, as a managing director in October. In September, Credit Suisse hired former Morgan Stanley managing director Charles Newton as head of biotechnology investment banking.
Credit Suisse is working on the largest health-care deal of the year, advising Genzyme Corp. on the more-than $18 billion offer it received in August from Sanofi-Aventis SA. Genzyme rejected the offer, calling the $69-per-share bid too low.
At Lazard, Alva advised on Thermo Electron Corp.’s purchase of Fisher Scientific for $12.8 billion in 2006 to form the world’s largest lab-instruments maker. He worked with Abbott Laboratories on its $4.3 billion acquisition of Guidant Corp.’s heart-stent business in 2006, and catheter maker Arrow International Inc. on its $2 billion sale to Teleflex Inc. in 2007.
Alva, who started his career at Kidder Peabody & Co. as an analyst, will report to Andy Lipsky, head of Americas mergers and acquisitions for Credit Suisse. He’s among executives and bankers to leave Lazard following the death of CEO Bruce Wasserstein.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jennifer Sondag at email@example.com
Bloomberg reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.