Peterson's $1 Billion Bet Shows Return as Deficit Concerns Rise

Wall Street financier Peter G. Peterson got a decent return on his investment last week when Senate Republicans ended the Democrats’ third attempt to push though an extension of unemployment benefits and President Barack Obama failed to persuade his European counterparts at the Group of 20 meeting in Toronto to maintain economic stimulus programs.

“I haven’t seen anything like this kind of concern in the 30 years I’ve been talking and writing about this,” says the 84-year-old fiscal hawk.

Peterson has committed $1 billion of the fortune he made as co-founder of the New York-based private-equity firm Blackstone Group LP to his personal crusade: raising the alarm about the $13 trillion national debt, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its July 5 issue.

He is paying the bills at a foundation that bears his name, supports a network of like-minded advocacy groups, backs The Fiscal Times, an online newspaper, formed a commission of experts, and organizes conferences with marquee guests such as former President Bill Clinton. The crusade appears to be in sync with the concerns of most voters, with a June 4 Gallup poll showing that the federal debt and terrorism were tied for first place (at 40 percent each) as the biggest threats to Americans’ future well-being.

His influence is raising some hackles, even among those who agree the national debt is a long-term worry.

‘Buy the Debate’

“Everywhere you look, he’s trying to buy the debate,” says Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future, a self-described progressive advocacy group in Washington. He calls Peterson-backed organizations, such as the Concord Coalition, nothing more than “front groups” used to help “stampede” lawmakers into cutting Social Security and Medicare.

Some congressional Democrats criticize what they see as Peterson’s single-minded emphasis. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin, a Michigan Democrat, says acting to narrow the deficit must be balanced against the need to “make sure we don’t slip into another recession.”

To his supporters, though, Peterson is the patron saint of fiscal responsibility.

“He has devoted more personal wealth to reducing the deficit than anybody in the history of the world,” says Tennessee Representative Jim Cooper, a fiscally conservative Democrat who voted against the jobless benefits measure.

‘Boring People for Decades’

Peterson’s interest in fiscal rectitude has deep roots: The one-time commerce secretary for President Richard Nixon has devoted four books and countless op-eds and speeches to the subject. “I’ve been boring people with it for decades,” he said in a speech in April. Two years ago, he kicked the campaign into high gear, vowing to devote a substantial portion of his $1.8 billion payout from Blackstone’s 2007 initial public offering to the cause.

As the son of Greek immigrants, he says his goal is to ensure that future generations aren’t deprived of similar opportunities by a national debt his group estimates at $61.9 trillion, or $200,000 per American, including the cost of fully funding Social Security.

He has been careful to emphasize that he understands the “urgent need to create jobs.” At the same time, he says, tough choices lie ahead, including tax increases and cuts in spending that could target entitlement programs. He supports a “well- targeted stimulus” so long as “it is accompanied by meaningful action on the longer-term structural debts and deficits.”

Peterson had disbursed $300 million of the $1 billion pledge by March 31 of last year, according to tax records. His foundation says its next filing will show that those numbers have increased in the current fiscal year.

One of the groups that receives funding from Peterson, AmericaSpeaks, on June 26 organized public meetings on the deficit in 19 sites across the U.S. that its website says drew 3,500 participants.

To contact the reporters on this story: Max Berley in Washington at mberley@bloomberg.net; Brian Faler in Washington at bfaler@bloomberg.net.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.