Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Businessweek Archives

A Mini Stanford

Turns out, Millennium Bank was too good to be true.

At least that’s what the Securities & Exchange Commission is claiming. On March 26, the federal regulator put the kibosh on an alleged $68 million Ponzi scheme at the Caribbean-based bank.

The firm’s gambit sounds a lot like that of alleged fraudster Allen Stanford, who regulators claim ran an $8 billion fraud. Millennium offered high-yielding certificates of deposit with interest rates between 6% and 7.75%—investments that BusinessWeek first questioned back in February. The CDs, claims the SEC, were simply “fictitious.” The SEC alleges that William J. Wise and Kristi M. Hoegel ran the fraud, along with the help Jacqueline S. Hoegel (Kristi’s mom), Brijesh Chopra, and Philippe Angeloni

The complaint alleges that Millennium raised $68 million from investors over the past five years, luring them with promises of safety and security. Millennium also claimed it was wholly-owned by United Trust of Switzerland S.A. a Swiss-registered trust company founded in 1931. The SEC says United Trust isn’t a Swiss bank or securities dealer.

It didn’t take much digging for us to have serious doubts about the bank’s pedigree. The Swiss banking regulators had never heard of United Trust of Switzerland. (Millennium said its parent company didn’t have a website as to “maintain absolute privacy” of its customers.)

The regulator’s complaint alleges the defendants “misappropriated” investors’ money to pad their own accounts and pay personal expenses. Millennium, claims the SEC, made only nominal payments to investors.

“The defendants disguised their Ponzi scheme as a legitimate offshore investment and made promises about exuberant returns that were just too good to be true,” said Rose Romero, Director of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office.

blog comments powered by Disqus