Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Request a Demo

Bloomberg

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.

Company

Financial Products

Enterprise Products

Media

Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000

Communications

Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Businessweek Archives

The poor get poorer


Isn’t it always the way? In most parts of the country, folks at the bottom are seeing the biggest declines in home prices, according to a new analysis by Zillow.com. People with more expensive homes are faring a little better. The pattern is particularly obvious in California.

Here are some examples of how prices in the bottom fifth and the top fifth of homes in various markets have done over the past year.

Los Angeles

bottom -14.2%

top -4.1%

Sacramento

bottom -29%

top -13.5%

San Diego

bottom -20.1%

top -5.1%

(continued)

San Francisco

bottom -19.6%

top +2.8%

San Jose

bottom -8.3%

top +11.6%

Boston

bottom -11.5%

top -4.7%

New York

bottom -5%

top -4.1%

Washington

bottom -7.1%

top +2.4%

Miami

bottom -19.6%

top -14.8%

There are a few important exceptions to the pattern, where the houses at the top lost more value:

Chicago

bottom -2.2%

top -8.3%

Orlando

bottom -11.3%

top -11.7%

Phoenix

bottom -12.2%

top -13.7%

Ironically, for the country as a whole, the top has done worse than the bottom:

U.S.

bottom -0.7%

top -7.5%

But that statistic is misleading. It reflects the fact that the housing bubble was most inflated in expensive states like California, and least problematic in cheap states like Texas.

For more data, click here and then click on home value bands.


LIMITED-TIME OFFER SUBSCRIBE NOW
 
blog comments powered by Disqus