Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

YouTube's Licensing Question and the Record Labels

? Our own history: What do we leave behind? |


| It's JerryTime and the Fate of Press Releases ?

September 07, 2006

YouTube's Licensing Question and the Record Labels

Heather Green

Fred Wilson has an interesting analysis of YouTube's revenue potential. As part of his estimate, he does some musing. "Let's say that 60% of the videos being served on YouTube are unlicensed content that could be licensed with the right business deal," he writes. Another 20%, he posits is high quality user created videos.

Wilson's point is that content companies (and indie producers) could cut a deal and split revenues with YouTube. (He suggests a 10-second ad in front of each video.) This revenue would make the content producers happy and do away with the messy copyright issues dogging the company.

I actually recently spoke with some music labels about this. YouTube and the labels are in talks to hammer out a licensing deal in particular for all the music videos that appear online. One record label exec explained the talks this way: The labels would actually rather take a stake in YouTube than sign a revenue sharing deal.

Why? Because the revenue model is still a work in progress, but the company looks like a good takeover or even IPO candidate. Agreeing to a revenue sharing deal is like selling your car today to someone who doesn't have any money but promises to pay you in 18 months, this exec explained. YouTube has been wary of alienating users by plopping traditional preroll ads in its videos. Instead, it's taking the more untried route of crafting new kinds of ad formats and approaches. So there isn't an easy model to follow.

YouTube won't comment on the negotiations, but I doubt they would want to give up a piece of themselves. Still, the leverage the taht labels have is the threat of a copyright infringement lawsuit if some kind of deal can't be reached.

Update: See the take from Charlie O'Donnell, Dead 2.0, and Calacanis, on why they think prerolls won't work.

11:31 AM

digital media

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference YouTube's Licensing Question and the Record Labels:

? Universal: YouTube/MySpace Bad Cop? from The 463: Inside Tech Policy

Just as we get back from the Video on the Net Big Hug conference feeling warm and fuzzy, Universal Records boss Doug Morris sends out cold pricklies. As AP, Reuters and the New York Post have reported Morris pulled a [Read More]

Tracked on September 15, 2006 01:08 AM

Sweet... link love from Heather. :)

Posted by: Charlie at September 9, 2006 03:29 PM

blog comments powered by Disqus