Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

Downward productivity revision coming

? New Knees for Old |


| Bad News and Good News on Productivity ?

August 07, 2006

Downward productivity revision coming

Michael Mandel

Tomorrow's numbers from the BLS are likely to show a sharp downward revision in productivity growth for 2004 and 2005. Instead of an average productivity gain of 3.0% for those two years, the new pace is likely to be closer to 2.5% or 2.6% (this is based on looking at the revisions in the latest GDP release).

This raises the worrisome possibility that the productivity boom may not have been as strong as we thought.

10:19 AM


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Downward productivity revision coming:

? Will Productivity Be Revised Downward? from Economist's View

If this is true, its bad news for supply side advocates: Downward productivity revision coming, by Michael Mandel, Economics Unbound: Tomorrow's numbers from the BLS are likely to show a sharp downward revision in productivity growth for 2004 and 2005. [Read More]

Tracked on August 7, 2006 07:01 PM


The single most valuable long-term statistic is going to be revised downward. This also means that a recession in 2007 is more probable than before..

Posted by: Kartik at August 7, 2006 01:27 PM

I don't like it any more than you do.

Posted by: Mike Mandel at August 7, 2006 03:13 PM

Any word on what is causing the revision? What got missed?

Posted by: crack at August 8, 2006 09:19 AM


What are your thoughts on this morning's productivity numbers?

Posted by: Jim Haggerty at August 8, 2006 10:04 AM

How do you spell government fraud and corruption?

D O W N W A R D R E V I S I O N...

Posted by: Alex S. Gabor at December 12, 2006 12:21 PM

As the resident cynic, I am not remotely surprised and haven't bought into the reported productivity numbers for a long time. Seriously folks, do you really think we've entered a new era of productivity growth? Computers were a little boost and Internet availability kicked it up a notch, but that's all worked in to the equation at this point. It doesn't matter how fast computers are; human beings can only work so fast. A lot of the productivity growth lately has been from squeezing more work out of fewer people for less pay. Look at the median income, particularly for those recently entering the workforce with a bachelor's degree. They're gullible enough to accept ever-lower "entry-level" pay for more "mid-level" work. And why not? What's their option?

I think our problem - nationally - is a downward spiral of innovativeness and entrepreneurialism (no, opening another lousy Starbucks franchise doesn't count); and I think I know what the cause is. But that's another discussion.

Posted by: Brandon W at December 12, 2006 02:26 PM

Though, it occurs to me after I hit "Post" that Starbucks doesn't franchise. So let's just insert "McDonald's" or "Goin' Postal" and call it a day.

Posted by: Brandon W at December 12, 2006 02:29 PM

blog comments powered by Disqus