Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

Matsushita's branding dilemma

China tops India again |


| Korea’s Phone Vibrates to Music

July 19, 2006

Matsushita's branding dilemma

Kenji Hall

It seems Matsushita Electric Industrial is considering a new strategy for its brand. A few days ago, Matsushita officials sent out a survey by email to journalists asking for advice. The company--which sells Panasonic TVs, cameras and other consumer electronics as well as National rice cookers and air-conditioning units and other home appliances--wanted to know what it could do to raise the profile of the Panasonic brand. It didn’t say specifically that it would consider doing away with the company’s formal name, but that seemed to be what they were hinting at.

It might be a wise choice. In Japan, the popular pun on the company’s name was "Maneshita" (rough translation: copycat) for its tendency to sell products that resemble competitors'. And it rarely breaks into the ranks of the globe’s top brands. That’s starting to change. Now, execs encourage engineers to work on new technologies that would distinguish Matsushita’s products from rivals’. It’s showing in the acclaim the company has won for its innovation, most recently with the IDEA awards. Matsushita took home the most prizes of any company in the contest.

Getting rid of the Matsushita name (it's the surname of the founder who started the company eight decades ago) might make it easier to focus on its brand message to consumers. Most top global brands--Nike, Toyota, Apple, Sony, Google and Microsoft spring to mind--sell products under the same name as the company’s. Matsushita should take note--and follow suit. Selling products under a different name from the company's can confuse consumers (and would-be investors), especially in overseas markets where the Matsushita name carries little weight.

A snippet from the email: Today, we would like to ask your advice on how we can increase the chance for us to be described as "Panasonic" in your publications. Our official registered company name is Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. However, it is also true that the penetration of "Matsushita" is quite low on a global basis. We feel it is very important that we deliver the consistent brand image concentrating on "Panasonic."

The fact that the company is thinking about this at all is a big step in the right direction. I can understand why the commpany might be reluctant to suddenly change its name (history, tradition). But if that helps Panasonic nail down a coherent brand message while broadening its image from a flat-panel plasma TV maker to one that sells all-purpose consumer electronics, it's worth considering. The email sent to journalists might have been a very preliminary trial balloon. But if you ask me, the company already knows what it has to do.

03:21 AM

Consumer Electronics

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Matsushita has been a reputable household name for years. They have been selling products under trade names such as Technics, Panasonic, National, and Matsushita. Instead of ridding the Matsushita name, the company ought to do one better in segmenting the brand names. Matsushita remains the corporate icon. Otherwise, they will risk cannibalizing each brand rather than taking the markets from their competitors. Technics should be used to compete with the likes of BOSE, B&O, or Harmon Kardon. A high end enthusiast hi-fi brand. Panasonic remains the household white-goods and electronics brand associating with solid-tech, medium price and durability. National, a bit generic for today should be shelved until sometime in the future. Meanwhile, Matsushita should be preserved and used only as the name for the holding company. Don't drop the name just for the sake of following Nike, SONY, Microsoft, or Google, Matsushita should be a name used with pride and dignity.

Posted by: Isbrand Ho at July 19, 2006 09:21 PM

If I understand correctly, Panasonic is jst one company owned by Matsushita. It's like GM suddenly deciding to call itself Chevrolet, just to boost the image of its largest subsidiary.

I don't think the name difference between consumer brand (Panasonic) and parent company (Matsushita) is the problem, or leads to any confusion. Matsushita should rather concentrate on adding value to its respective brands. Advertising Panasonic as a quality brand and offering innovative products would help a lot more than simply renaming the parent company to carry the same name as its consumer brand.

Posted by: RT at July 24, 2006 10:50 AM

I wasn't even aware that the Technics brand was supplied by the same company that supplies Panasonic and National! just goes to show you ...

Posted by: PDH at August 25, 2006 06:10 PM

blog comments powered by Disqus