Goodie Bags? Bah Humbug! |
| Mommy Wars Part III
March 14, 2006
Mommy Wars II
Several readers responded to my previous blog on the “Mommy Wars,” a collection of essays by 26 writers including Jane Smiley and Susan Cheever about the supposed conflict between moms who work and moms who stay at home. Many believe the media has either exaggerated or fabricated the whole thing. I can see their point. After all, even Susan Cheever--whose essay begins, “There is a war going on in the streets of New York City”--would surely acknowledge that no one is detonating bombs at PTA meetings. Moreover, many moms--myself included--consider themselves neither a stay-at-home nor a working parent, but something in between. Needless to say, we all have plenty of friends from both “camps.”
But I still think there’s something to this “Mommy Wars” thing. Maybe the “war” metaphor is too heavy-handed. A better description? How about “inner catfight,” to borrow from “Mommy Wars” editor Leslie Morgan Steiner. Of course, some women do criticize one another's lifestyles ("What does she do all day? I can't imagine how bored she must be!" versus "Her children run to the nanny first. They never see her."). But more often, the conflict plays out within ourselves, as we endlessly debate the decisions we’ve made (or have been forced to make)--pitting our inner “stay at home mom” against our inner “high powered executive.” It's our own conflicts that prompt us to sometimes make stereotypical judgments about one another or to feel as if we've been judged and found sorely lacking.
Here’s an example of an "inner catfight," from Steiner's introduction to "Mommy Wars." One morning, as Steiner rushes off to work, feeling tired, stressed, and slightly neglectful of her child, she runs into a stay-at-home mom:
Other Mom: I don’t know how you do it.Steiner’s translation: I don’t know why you do it. You must be in really desperate need of money or self-esteem if you are willing to neglect your children in order to work. Not me--I love my children more and am clearly the superior mother.
Later, Steiner--home from her part-time job and “sitting on the floor of the kids’ weekly computer" class in sweats--watched a “slew of working moms who rushed in to pick up their kids, clad in child-unfriendly leather skirts and high-heeled boots… impatient for their children to finish up.” As the moms glanced at her on the floor, Steiner thought she detected a dismissive attitude: “What makes them think their contributions to the world are more valuable than mine?” she writes.
Sometimes, I hear the same translator. A few years ago, I made the mistake of broaching the “Should I quit? or should I stick it out until my youngest is in kindergarten?” conversation with a mom I had just met. Turns out, she had recently quit a job similar to mine. As our boys played superheroes, she told me she decided to stay home because she felt her kids needed her. What I heard, though, was an accusation—-that kids suffer when moms work. Is that the message she meant to convey? Was she feeling defensive? Or was what I read into her remark a product of my own guilt? I’ll never know--largely because I won’t go there again with her (or anyone else I barely know). The potential friendship fizzled--perhaps a casualty of the mommy wars.
Is there some hype in Steiner’s anecdotes? I’m sure. Steiner and her fellow essayists are good story tellers. They’re also out to sell books. But let’s be honest. When you feel tired, overwhelmed, or underappreciated, don’t you ever lash out--if only for a moment and if only in the privacy of your own thoughts? Not at people you know well and respect, of course, but at an anonymous target that epitomizes the "other" side, such as the “playground” or “blackberry” crowd.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mommy Wars II:
Instead of The Mommy Wars, The Parenting Dialectic from The Barely Attentive Mother
Do the mommy wars actually exist, working mothers and stay-at-home moms armed against each other? Or are they a fiction hyped by the irresponsible media, as NOW suggests to ABC in an online letter? Yes and yes. There are women [Read More]
Tracked on March 14, 2006 02:03 PM
A parent who is forced to stay home or feels they are obligated to stay home, for whatever, reason will be much less supportive and nurturing than someone who wants to stay home. They become an "employee" with bad attitude, which is good for no one.
Posted by: Michael at March 14, 2006 03:08 PM
Maybe I am daft, but after all these years, with so many of us in th workforce and now deciding to come home to raise kids at a any age (age meaning mommies and kids alike) I can't BELIEVE we are still having this stupid cattiness. It really angers me that women take sides in this. Can't we just support each other in our choices?
Posted by: Sneadwoman at March 15, 2006 08:07 AM
I find myself wondering if this internal dialogue is connected solely to choices about working or not working. I worry all the time that I am somehow shortchanging my children, despite the fact that I neither question my own choice not to work nor feel that anyone else is questioning--or criticizing--my choice. Parents--mothers AND fathers, working or not--are always struggling to do what is best for their children. Assigning this kind of internal dialogue specifically to the 'Mommy Wars' prevents any kind of really useful conversation about how we are raising our children.
Leslie Morgan Steiner has chosen to
Posted by: Susan at March 16, 2006 02:57 PM
What I started to say was this: Steiner has chosen to focus on the extremes, to use the hype, to sell her book. I think that women are able to find more common ground than she gives us credit for, and I think that parents in general are working to get past the 'blackberry' and 'playgroup' stereotypes and move toward a new parenting rhetoric.
Posted by: Susan at March 16, 2006 05:41 PM