Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

Fewer Apartments Available

Why Are Young People Leaving Vermont? |


| Donald Trump, Mortgage Broker

March 08, 2006

Fewer Apartments Available

Peter Coy

Scary report out today from Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. Here's an excerpt from the press release:

New York City, NY – The nation is losing approximately 200,000 rental housing units each year due to demolition, significantly compounding the ongoing housing affordability squeeze gripping millions of families. New research on rental housing market dynamics from Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies finds that while the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program and other initiatives contribute over 100,000 new units of affordable rental housing each year, that is still less than the number of low-rent units disappearing. “We are taking one step forward and two steps back as gentrification in some neighborhoods and continued deterioration in others leads to the removal of vitally needed lower-cost rental housing,” notes Nicolas P. Retsinas, director of the Joint Center.

03:07 PM


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Eeek! But the Meatpacking District et al didn't rise out of nowhere....

Posted by: NYC Girl at March 13, 2006 08:47 PM

In Washington State, we've had a loss of apartments as more developers are converting them to condominiums. There were so many lawsuits against builders of condo's due to shoddy construction and materials failure, and the risk is less with conversions, causing a lack of affordable rentals in Seattle. The only apartments and condos being built now are huge developments, with builders taking advantage of economies of scale.

Posted by: Marlow at March 14, 2006 09:54 AM

Oh boy - another argument to support the housing bubble. The early 80s was a time of tremendous apartment building and many of those complexes are nearing the end of their useful life. I see no problems with tearing down 70s and 80s vintage apartments to replace with condos or new apartment developments. To me a suburban rental has a 30-year lifespan: Years 1-10 are luxury new apartments, 10-20 are regular apartments, and 20-30 are lower income apartments.

As our love affair with everything condo wears off we should see an increase in new apartment complexes once rental demand returns.

BTW, enjoyed your look at Ma Bell in the recent magazine.

Posted by: Wes at March 14, 2006 02:40 PM

As an accountant for one of the nations largest multifamily REIT, I have witnessed, over the past 3+ years, our company experiencing traditionally low occupancy rates. I believe the conversion of apartments to condos as just a 'pendulum swing' in the other direction. Our occupancy rates during the end of 2005 and beginning of 2006 are starting to go on the upswing.


One of the reasons for many of the condo conversions was that the supply of multifamily units was higher than the demand. The conversions are simply an economic reaction of the supply to match the demand.


This is mearly the opinion of a lowly acountant.

Posted by: Annonymous at March 18, 2006 02:14 PM

blog comments powered by Disqus