? Blogging our stories would change this blog--for better or for worse? |
| Elements of Style ?
January 16, 2006
Why we keep secrets in the mainstream press
One of the commenters on Buzzmachine, FYJ, points out that there was not one shred of a scoop in the math story. So why not blog it?
In response, here's primer on why we mainstream press types are secretive, even when we don't have scoops.
In past years, I've had big cover projects consigned to inside space when the competition runs an article that has even the appearance of covering the same story. Sometimes the story in the Journal, Forbes or Fortune is hardly related. But editors in the past (and I'm stressing the past, because I haven't suffered this in a while) worked with the idea that if readers think they're familiar with a story, they won't bother reading it. And what's more, they'll think the magazine runs stale stories. (I'll pause here for everyone to make the requisite BusinessWeek quip...) So a story loses its cover not because it's stale, but because readers may think that it is (without reading it, naturally).
Now, I'm just trying to explain a certain mindset that some people would consider paranoid. If you open-source the reporting of a story, it gets into the buzz. Other news outlets, while perhaps not copying your story, begin sniffing around related angles. Bits of the story get into the news. It becomes the dreaded "familiar." And your editors, while perhaps appreciating your story, take it off the cover in favor of something fresher. They put it inside, and give it a good trimming.
This is the thinking that leads us to be secretive. An inside story has lower impact and counts for less in the annual review, which is tied to salary.
So, to conclude, by open-sourcing a story, you may bring more traffic to your blog and get all kinds of attention in the blogworld. It benefits from the wisdom of hundreds of highly informed readers. It is a virtuous and worthwhile endeavor. But it may get knocked off the cover. In coming years, success on the blogs will count for more and more, and the importance of the cover of the paper edition of the magazine will likely diminish. But we're not there yet.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why we keep secrets in the mainstream press:
? Media Should Start With Conversation, Then Synthesis from Publishing 2.0
The problem with the current debate over Old Media vs. New Media is that most people see it in binary terms — either Old Media dies and the web becomes a completely open marketplace of commoditized content (as Jeff Jarvis and countless others hav... [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2006 06:03 PM
Insight into professional journalism from Mike's Points
BusinessWeek's Stephen Baker has some excellent recent posts that let us into the inner workings of how professional media work, and even a preview of the mergence of journalism and blogging. For the Jan. 23, 2006, issue he authored the... [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2006 10:05 PM
Thank you for the insight into how professional media works.
While important, the blogosphere is not BW's primary audience. For the most part, those who read, blog or are familiar with blogs are in the minority.
Plus, blogging while a story in progress would be like an engineer blogging while working on a new product. The competition would definitely also ready about it. And, if they thought it was worthwhile, they would try to "scoop" that engineer.
While the math story may not have provided any scoop, it doesn't mean that it was not worthwhile -- and worthy of being scooped up by another media outlet.
Thanks again for letting us into the BW newsroom.
Posted by: Mike Driehorst at January 16, 2006 09:22 PM