? Podcasting Down Under |
| Technorati traffic jam ?
July 13, 2005
Tour de France blogger steers clear of promoting sponsor
Just read Ted Darling's posts from the Tour de France. He's the Subaru-backed sweepstakes winner (on the left in the photo, with event blogger Ian Jackson) I talked to last week. It's a nice account of the riding. But I don't see exactly how Subaru benefits from it. (Maybe it's from posts like this.) You branding and PR bloggers out there, is this a soft-sell model more marketers will be following?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Hi Stephen: May I kindly suggest that if you are going to write about SUBARU, that you spell it correctly? And by the way, I haven't found a mention of SUBARU in either spelling (!) on the aforementioned Ted Darling's posts!
Posted by: Darlene at July 13, 2005 03:42 PM
Hi Darlene, so sorry I misspelled the company in the previous post. But I got it right this time, didn't I? Here's a cut and paste from their Web site: Subaru World Rally Team.
Posted by: steve baker at July 13, 2005 05:10 PM
I think it's certainly a soft sell, but then again, Subaru doesn't have much invested in this, does it? A trip to the Tour, some electronic equipment, logding, and a bit of cycling stuff is all they're providing, isn't it? They probably got most of this stuff free from other relationships/sponsorships they have over there, so to get ANY mentions/exposure for this likely makes their "investment" pay out.
Posted by: John at July 14, 2005 08:18 AM