Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

An answer on airline M&A

? Check out "Random Gleanings" |


| Nasdaq's 5-Year Anniversary ?

March 03, 2005

An answer on airline M&A

Amey Stone

I didn't get a flood of responses to my 2/22 post raising the question of why there's been no airline M&A. But Jack Miller, from South Carolina made some excellent points on Tuesday.

Miller writes:

"The airline business is very highly leveraged. This is from an operating point of view and from a financial point of view. The surviving airlines will quickly go from losing millions to making millions. Your competitor has all the capacity it can use and is trying to hang-on until the turn. He is already head over heels in debt and needs no more. If you do not make the turn, he gets his share of your business without paying you a dime. In the mean-time, GE is willing to lend billions to the airlines using the planes as collateral. GE wins when airlines hang-on through the down turn."

Some of Miller's thoughts are echoed in a New York Times article that Sheldon Libor (who originally raised the question), brought to my attention on Monday: "Even for the Sickest of Airlines, Financial Skies Can Be Friendly."

"Here is a partial answer," writes Sheldon. "All the losers are being artificially propped up."

Anyone else want to chime in?

11:18 PM

TrackBack URL for this entry:

blog comments powered by Disqus