No question about it, Apple Computer's (AAPL) new iMac G5 is beautiful. The minimalist design, whose echoes of the iPod are entirely intentional, would grace any desk. Although I have some quibbles with the details, the iMac offers outstanding performance at a fair price. Still, lovely as the iMac is, I think Apple may be blowing an opportunity to expand its market.
This is the third generation of iMacs, and the only family resemblance is an all-in-one design radically different from anything else on the market. The previous iMacs put their guts in a hemispherical base and used a clever arm that let you position the 15- or 17-inch displays just about anywhere you wanted. The new versions mount all the electronics behind the wide-screen 17- or 20-in. display that is only about two inches thick, and the entire unit stands on a curved aluminum foot.
Apple cools the system with large, slow-turning fans, so it's whisper-quiet. If you add the optional wireless networking card ($79) and Bluetooth module and wireless mouse and keyboard package ($99), the only wire running into your iMac will be the power cord. Mac OS X is the best personal-computer operating system today by a fair margin, and the iMac comes preloaded with Apple's very good suite of iLife programs, including iPhoto and iTunes for picture and music management, respectively, and the Garage Band music composition and recording system.
THE HARDWARE IS BEAUTIFUL, the software is beautiful -- so what's wrong with this picture? For one thing, some functionality seems to have been lost in the interest of aesthetics. The previous generation of iMacs allowed almost unlimited adjustment of both horizontal and vertical screen angle and a considerable range of height. The new models offer effortless vertical tilt, but only up to 30 degrees. Horizontal movement is accomplished by swiveling the entire unit, which has a slippery plastic pad on the bottom of the aluminum foot. There is no height adjustment at all, a serious blow to good ergonomics. The iMac has a full complement of ports, including three USB and two FireWire sockets and even a digital audio link, but all the connectors, as well as the power button, are in the back. This keeps the front and sides perfectly clean, but it means you have to turn the unit to plug anything in.
Price is another concern. The cheapest iMac, the 17-in. with a 1.6 gigahertz G5 processor, doesn't sound too bad at $1,299. But Apple prices all of the iMacs with a bare minimum of 256 megabytes of memory, which will hobble performance. Bringing that to 512 MB adds $75; moving to a gigabyte, which you'll want for Garage Band or any serious photo or video editing, adds $225. Throw in the wireless options, and the base iMac is up to a hefty $1,702, while the 20-in. version goes well over $2,000. By contrast, you can get a Dell (DELL) Dimension 4600 with a 3.2 GHz Pentium 4, a gigabyte of memory, and a 17-in. flat panel display for $1,164. Elegance is expensive.
Considering the excellence of the software, Apple deserves a larger share of the market than the low single digits it has been able to garner, and consumers deserve more access to Apple products. The average selling price of a desktop PC is below $750, and few go for more than $1,000. But Apple's only sub-$1,000 computers are two dated eMacs, bulbous all-in-ones with 17-in. CRT displays.
With any real improvement in Windows at least two years away, I think Apple could shake the industry by offering, for $700 or less, a PC-like Mac box for which consumers would provide their own displays. The company wouldn't have to scrimp on features or quality; the unit would lack the elegant design of the iMac G5, but it would still be a Mac. Given Apple's obsession with beautiful but expensive industrial design, there is almost no chance we'll ever see such a product. And that's a shame, both for Apple and for its prospective customers.
For a collection of past columns and online-only reviews of technology products, click here
By Stephen H. Wildstrom