Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Will the Homeland Be Made Safer?

On June 6, President George W. Bush proposed adding a new Homeland Security Dept. to his Cabinet to coordinate the government's campaign against terrorism -- and to help avoid the kind of intelligence lapses that may or may not have contributed to the success of the terrorist attacks against New York and Washington last September 11.

The new department would be formed by collecting under one roof existing federal agencies that have 169,000 employees and budgets totaling $37.4 billion -- but would exclude the FBI and the CIA.

What's your opinion of this approach to defending the country against terrorists? And how willing are you to live with some of the side effects of such an approach, including intrusions into your personal privacy? (See BW Online, 6/5/02, "Special Report: New Threats to Privacy".)

That's what we hope to discover in this Reader Survey, which, as always, isn't a scientific poll, since anyone who wishes to can participate.

Do you support the President's proposal to create a new Cabinet department for homeland security?



Don't know

What statement best describes your opinion of the proposal to organize disparate federal agencies under one roof?

It's the right solution

It isn't ideal, but it's the best way to get something done quickly

It'll be a bureaucratic nightmare

No opinion

The new department, as described by the President, would include neither the FBI nor the CIA. Do you think:

Neither should be included

The CIA should be included

The FBI should be included

Both should be included

No opinion

Would you prefer to see a thorough debate over such issues in Congress, or quick bipartisan approval, with the details to be tied up later?

Thorough debate

Quick action

No opinion

As part of its homeland-defense effort, the government will have expanded surveillance powers over both U.S. citizens and visitors to the country. Do you think this is:


Not ideal, but necessary

An abuse of federal power

No opinion

Once all the proposed changes are in place, how much more prepared do you think the government will be to fend off terrorism?

Much more prepared

Somewhat more prepared

No more prepared

No opinion

blog comments powered by Disqus