Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

The Trade Gap May Be Inflated

Economic Trends

The Trade Gap May Be Inflated

Exports seem to be undercounted

Unsustainable trends, the late economist Herbert Stein wryly observed, simply do not last. And the unsustainable trend currently stirring a heated debate in economic circles is the nation's record trade gap, which, along with a net outflow of investment income, pushed the current-account deficit last quarter to 4.2% of gross domestic product--its highest level in at least 120 years.

Like many of his colleagues, economist Ian Morris of HSBC Securities Inc. views this figure with some trepidation. Sometime within the next year or two, he warns, foreign investors worried about America's growing indebtedness may start pulling money out of the U.S. That in turn could touch off a "vicious spiral" as a plunging dollar roils the markets and forces the Federal Reserve to step hard on the monetary brakes, imperiling the long expansion.

Consultant L. Douglas Lee of Economics from Washington Inc. thinks this danger is exaggerated, however. And his reason isn't simply the common view that foreigners know they are helping to finance America's high-tech boom and thus enhancing the nation's ability to service its foreign debt. Rather, he argues, the trade deficit itself is overstated.

Lee points to anomalies in economic data that have cropped up in recent years. The first is a gap between the two ways the nation's output is measured: via spending on final product and via income flows. While the product accounts are viewed as more reliable and are used in calculating GDP, the income accounts usually track them closely. Since the start of 1997, however, a large "statistical discrepancy" has opened between the two measures, with the income data showing significantly faster growth.

Commerce Dept. officials have speculated that this gap may reflect an undercounting of exports. Indeed, a 1997 Census Bureau study estimated that U.S. merchandise exports could be understated by as much as 10%, or $60 billion. One reason is that more and more small businesses and small-volume shippers have become exporters in recent years, and data reporting for these companies is skimpy. As Lee notes: " may export millions of dollars worth of books each year, but it faces no reporting requirements as long as each package is valued under $2,500."

Another anomaly, says Lee, is the divergence between the current-account deficit (mainly reflecting trade data) and the savings deficit, which is the amount by which domestic savings falls short of domestic investment. By definition, the two should be mirror images, but in recent years, the savings deficit has been about 40% smaller (chart).

In short, Lee thinks faulty measurement of U.S. exports has resulted in significantly overstated trade and current-account deficits. If he's right, it would not only help explain the dollar's persistent strength but would also give a lift to recent productivity and output data. And it would lessen the chances of capital flight that some fear could eventually derail the expansion.By Gene KoretzReturn to top

Return to top

Insider Selling? No Problem

If it's a Net stock, investors shrug

Wall Streeters are known to keep a sharp eye on insider transactions, and when top managers sell some of their equity stakes, it's often regarded as a sign that a stock may be overvalued. Indeed, studies have found that individual stocks tend to underperform the market in the wake of insider sales.

All of which suggests a potential problem for Internet companies, which seek to motivate their managers by compensating them with hefty amounts of stock and stock options. As it happens, Net stocks are extremely volatile, exhibiting far larger price swings than those of other stocks. That degree of risk gives insiders a strong incentive to diversify their portfolios by selling shares--even if they think their company's stock is undervalued.

How does the market view such transactions? To find out, economist Lisa K. Meulbroek of the Harvard business school compared market reactions to insider sales of Net stocks in recent years with similar sales of non-Internet stocks. In contrast with other stocks, she found, Net stocks showed no tendency to fall relative to the market in the wake of insider sales.

"Investors seem to understand that Internet insider sales aren't necessarily bad news," says Meulbroek. "But the high volume of such sales and the market's recent gyrations suggest that companies may start rethinking the wisdom of putting so much stock and stock options in the compensation basket."By Gene KoretzReturn to top

blog comments powered by Disqus