Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

A Threat To Monetary Union?

Economic Trends


Europe's joblessness may be a snag

One of the most puzzling developments in recent decades has been Europe's failure to generate jobs and reduce unemployment at a time when America's job performance has been strong. Whereas Europe's jobless rates in the 1960s and 1970s were consistently below those of the U.S., the opposite has been true in the 1980s and 1990s--and recently by a widening margin.

Since 1979, the U.S. economy has managed to create an eye-popping total of 30 million jobs. It has also lowered joblessness to a level that is as close to full employment as may be achievable without igniting inflation. But in Europe, net job creation has been minimal for nearly two decades, and unemployment has moved to record levels despite sluggish labor-supply growth.

The big question, of course, is why most European nations cannot get their job engines fired up--and why America can. In a recent paper in the International Labor Review, Freddy Heylen, Lucia Goubert, and Eddy Omey of the University of Ghent in Belgium suggest an answer that observers have tended to ignore: the sharp contrast in macroeconomic policies on different sides of the Atlantic.

The consensus view among economists is that industrial economies in recent decades have been buffeted by structural shifts sparked by technological advances, foreign competition, and globalization. Because of its relatively flexible labor market and wage structure, the U.S. economy was able to adjust to these shocks and continue to generate jobs. But in Europe, so the story goes, job growth has been impeded by such policies as high minimum wages and payroll taxes, restrictions on firing, and generous social benefits (page 23).

The three economists don't reject these explanations. But they note that restructuring in the U.S., which began in the 1980s, has had the benefit of stimulative macroeconomic policies during much of the past decade and a half.

Short-term interest rates, for example, trended down in the U.S. in much of the 1980s and early 1990s. And U.S. fiscal policy was highly stimulative through the mid-1980s. By contrast, European monetary and fiscal policy has been far more restrictive. Indeed, the researchers estimate that Europe's unemployment rate would have been as much as 1 1/2 percentage points lower in recent years if demand growth had matched that of the U.S. in the 1980s and early 1990s.

All of this points to a catch-22 in current European economic strategy. To join the planned European Monetary Union, governments are pursuing tight fiscal and monetary policies. They are also trying to promote job growth through benefit cuts and reforms that enhance labor market flexibility.

The problem is that such reforms are unlikely to succeed or prove politically feasible in the absence of favorable macroeconomic policies. And unless they succeed--and bring lower deficits--European nations are unlikely to meet the fiscal criteria established for EMU membership. Indeed, speculation is rife that Germany will opt for a delay in the starting time for monetary union because rising joblessness threatens to push its own deficit out of bounds.By GENE KORETZReturn to top

Return to top


The intriguing question they raise

With nearly one out of every three U.S. births occurring outside of marriage, a common perception is that such births are primarily a teenage phenomenon. But as sociologists Daphne Spain and Suzanne M. Bianchi note in a book just published by the Russell Sage Foundation, teens account for only 30% of nonmarital births today, compared with 50% in 1970. Indeed, birthrates for unmarried women of all ages and races are up sharply since 1980.

The trend, say the authors, raises an intriguing question: To what extent does it reflect a growing ability of women to live independently, and to what extent is it occurring because men feel they can no longer afford to marry the mothers of their children?By GENE KORETZReturn to top

blog comments powered by Disqus