Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Businessweek Archives

Affluent, Dual Income Families Get Creamed By The Feds

Economic Trends


Although many Americans posted scant real income gains in the 1980s, one positive development was the emergence of a significant number of affluent dual-income households earning over $100,000. Now, economist Michael R. Englund of MMS International warns that recent increases in federal tax rates imposed on upper-income taxpayers may well throw this trend in reverse. In many cases, he says, lower-wage spouses in such families are likely to find that their earnings are subject to a marginal tax rate of 60% or higher.

Take a dual-income household with two kids, one spouse earning $110,000, and the other $55,000. Not only does such a family face a marginal federal income tax rate of 36%, says Englund, but the lower-wage spouse must also pay a tax bite of 7.65% for Social Security and Medicare. And the phaseout of itemized deductions and personal exemptions should add an additional 4% to the tax rate. Factor in a state income tax of 8% on high-income families, and you wind up with a 55%-plus marginal tax rate on the wages of the lower-income spouse.

That's not all. Englund figures that such a family spends about $15,000 a year on day care, home cleaning, laundry, and other costs that would be avoidable if one spouse decided to stay at home. That means the lower-earning spouse comes out just $10,000 ahead after taxes and home maintenance costs--a calculation that implies an effective marginal "tax rate" of over 80%.

If such considerations induce a lot of women to withdraw from the labor force, says Englund, the government's tax take could take a hit. Although households reporting $100,000-plus incomes represent just 3% of the U.S. population, they provide a hefty 34% of government revenues.GENE KORETZ

blog comments powered by Disqus