Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

GMAT Test Tips from Veritas Prep

GMAT Tip: Becoming Above Average on Average Problems

GMAT Tip: Becoming Above Average on Average Problems

Photograph by Getty Images

This tip on improving your GMAT score was provided by Brian Galvin at Veritas Prep.

In your job or in your life, calculating averages is relatively easy. Just type that code into Microsoft Excel (MSFT), drag the cursor across your data set, and voila—average!

But on the GMAT—without the help of Excel or a calculator—many students find calculating averages to be a task that takes longer than average. It doesn’t have to, though. There’s a secret about averages that can drastically reduce your calculation time and increase your accuracy:

When the number of terms doesn’t change, average problems can usually be solved just using the sum.

By now you should know that the average can be calculated by:

And for most, the least-enjoyable part of calculating an average is doing that division.  But this can be avoided if the number of values doesn’t change. In that case, you can do all your work using the sum. Consider the following example:

Which of the following series of numbers, if added to the set {1, 6, 11, 16, 21}, will not change the set’s average?

I. 1.50, 7.11, and 16.89

II. 5.36, 10.70, and 13.24

III. -21.52, 23.30, 31.22

(A) I only

(B) II only

(C) III only

(D) II and III only

(E) None

Those decimal places may already be giving you anxiety. Who wants to tally up three different 8-term sets, then divide them, to determine their averages? But there’s a workaround: The division is actually unnecessary.

You should see that the sum of the terms in the original set is 55, making the average of that set 11 (a quick division calculation you should be able to do in your head). And since you don’t want the average to change, you’ll want the new sum of 8 terms to be 88, keeping the average at 11. Since you already have 55 and you want a total of 88, the three new terms have to sum to 33. If you recognize that, this problem really comes down to a quick calculation: Do each of these three sets sum to 33?

From there, you should see that Sets I and II don’t get near enough to 33 to warrant even adding the decimals, and Set III does sum to 33. So the correct answer is C. More important is the takeaway: A great many average problems can be done quickly by simply working with the sum of the values and not performing redundant (and time-consuming) division.

Sign up for Veritas Prep’s free GMAT Question Bank and begin practicing with accurate GMAT sample questions.


GMAT Practice Test


Veritas Prep GMAT Diagnostic Quiz

Created for Bloomberg Businessweek readers, this diagnostic quiz is designed to measure your ability level with 25 realistic GMAT questions. Click here to take the quiz and get instant feedback about your performance.

Companies Mentioned

  • MSFT
    (Microsoft Corp)
    • $47.11 USD
    • -0.34
    • -0.72%
Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes.

Last Updated: 09:18 pm Market Summary

S&P500 2014.89 1.46
DJIA 17084.49 33.74
NASDAQ 4830.469 19.681
Stoxx 50 3250.31 25.35
FTSE 100 6416.16 41.34
DAX 10096.6 103.53
Nikkei 18438.67 297.5
Topix 1515.13 33.73
Hang Seng 22458.8 103.89
blog comments powered by Disqus