Fitch Rates North Slope Borough, AK's GOs 'AA'; Outlook Stable

  Fitch Rates North Slope Borough, AK's GOs 'AA'; Outlook Stable

Business Wire

SAN FRANCISCO -- October 4, 2013

Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'AA' rating to the following North Slope
Borough, Alaska (the borough) bonds:

--$100.2 million general obligation (GO) bonds series 2013A.

The bonds are scheduled to sell via negotiation on or about Oct. 15, 2013. The
proceeds will fund the borough's ongoing capital improvement program and costs
of issuance.

In addition, Fitch affirms the following rating:

--$354 million outstanding GO bonds at 'AA'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are backed by an unlimited ad valorem tax levy.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STRONG FINANCIAL POSITION: The borough's financial position is sound,
bolstered by a $456 million permanent fund and a large unrestricted general
fund balance that equaled 37.1% of spending in fiscal 2012.

MAJOR ENERGY PRODUCER: North Slope Borough is home to the U.S.'s largest oil
field in Prudhoe Bay as well as smaller but significant oil and natural gas
resources. Ongoing investment continues to provide a significant taxable
assessed value (AV), reaching $19.2 billion in 2013, up 49% since 2008.

CONCENTRATED TAX BASE: The tax base remains highly concentrated in the top 10
taxpayers represent 93.6% of AV. The borough has seen increased activity by
smaller oil companies over the years, but it has one of the most concentrated
tax bases in the nation.

NATURALLY DECLINING ASSETS: The borough's oil and gas reserves are
nonrenewable and naturally declining resources, but new investments, improved
technology and high oil prices have repeatedly pushed out the estimated
lifespan of borough oil fields. Significant activity is likely to continue for
the foreseeable future and well beyond the life of the bonds.

MODERATE DEBT BURDEN: The borough's debt burden is moderate and declining as a
percent of AV at 2.4%. Debt amortizes very rapidly, well within the lifespan
of the borough's existing oil fields.

CREDIT PROFILE

ENERGY EXTRACTION DEPENDENT

The borough has a large, energy-dominated economy. The borough is located on
the north coast of Alaska, encompassing 94,877 square miles, an area just
smaller than the states of Wyoming and Michigan. The borough's modest
population of 18,082 is comprised of year-round residents and seasonal workers
from the oil and gas industry. About 30% of U.S. oil reserves and 18% of
natural gas reserves are located in the borough, and estimates of total
recoverable reserves have increased over the years with improvements in
technology and the exploration of regions farther from the first fields
developed at Prudhoe in the 1960s and 1970s. The energy sector provides a
strong base for current economic activity.

Continued exploration of oil fields across the borough and in the Arctic
Ocean, the participation of more second tier oil and gas companies, and the
prospect of huge gas reserves in the North Slope suggest that activity will
continue at a significant level for the foreseeable future. The borough's
harsh Arctic environment is likely to support only a very limited economy in
the era after energy production, but the borough is actively building its
permanent fund to prepare for that time, which is likely to come well after
all currently outstanding debt matures in 10 years.

CONCENTRATED TAX BASE

The tax base is highly concentrated with 98% of AV related to the oil and gas
industry, which will eventually lead to substantial AV declines as resources
are depleted. The top two taxpayers, BP PLC (Issuer Default Rating 'A' with a
Stable Outlook) and ConocoPhillips (Issuer Default Rating 'A' with a Stable
Outlook), account for 67% of AV. The tax base is assessed based on the value
of capital investments in the borough. The economic value of these investments
is closely linked to the value of energy exports, and investment rises and
falls with energy commodity prices. However, AV has historically been much
less volatile and more predictable than energy commodity prices because it is
based on the depreciated value of the capital stock. AV increased at a
compound annual growth rate of 8.3% over the past five years.

While economic concentration limits the rating, the continued growth in the
tax base and continued investment in the local energy infrastructure suggests
that the borough's natural resources will support a very significant level of
economic activity for much longer than the rated bonds are outstanding. The
North Slope produces a significant portion revenues and economic output of the
state of Alaska (GOs rated 'AAA' with a Stable Outlook).

VERY STRONG FINANCIAL POSITION

Solid revenue growth and prudent management practices have allowed the borough
to build very large operating reserves. Unrestricted general fund balance (the
sum of committed, assigned and unassigned balances under GASB 54) was $154.9
million, or 37.1% of general fund expenditures and transfers out in fiscal
2012. Reserves have been bolstered by increased tax revenues due to the
state's reassessment of the value of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS).
Reserves are projected to have increased in 2013 due to reimbursement of about
$20 million of capital spending from bond proceeds.

The borough's operating budgets have come under moderate pressure due to
expenditure growth that has outpaced growth of its operating property tax
levy, forcing policymakers to reduce spending in fiscal 2013 and take budget
action to limit growth in 2014. The borough's fiscal 2013 and 2014 budgets
appear balanced. Solid revenue growth and a very strong reserve position
suggest that policymakers will have time and reasonable options as they seek
to keep ongoing expenditures in line with ongoing revenues; however, spending
pressures are likely to continue.

Revenue options are limited by state law. Policymakers are lobbying for
changes in state law that would allow the borough to use more of its taxing
capacity for operations and less for debt, but the outcome of such efforts is
uncertain. The current rating is dependent on the maintenance of significantly
above-average fund balances.

The borough's financial position is strengthened by a permanent fund with
about $506.9 million of assets as of June 30, 2013. The borough may withdraw
as much as 8% a year from the permanent fund, but has recently made
withdrawals of 4%. The fund has grown significantly over the years, despite
investment gains and losses. The borough has prudently decided that 25% of
growth in general fund balance will be deposited in the permanent fund, and
made a $9.5 million transfer (the first major deposit in years) in fiscal
2013.

MODERATE DEBT BURDEN

The debt burden is moderate. Direct debt will equal a moderate 2.4% of AV
after the current issue. Debt is extraordinarily high on a per capita basis at
$24,637 due to the sparsely populated nature of the borough. Debt amortizes
very rapidly with 90.4% paid off in five years and 100% paid in ten years.

The borough has no unfunded pension or other post-employment benefit (OPEB)
liabilities, as such obligations have been assumed by the state. The borough
pays a fixed percentage of payrolls to the state for pension and OPEB, but
these payments are a small part of its budget (2.6% of governmental funds
spending in 2012).

The total carrying cost of pension, OPEB and debt service is high at 30.1% of
spending due to the borough's practice of paying its bonds down very rapidly.
The elevated carrying cost is not a credit concern because it does not reflect
an excessive debt burden, given moderate debt ratios and rapid amortization.

LARGE CONTINGENT LIABILITY

The borough reports a large contingent liability related to ongoing litigation
over the taxable valuation of TAPS for tax years 2006 to 2011. The Alaska
Supreme Court is expected to rule on the issue in early 2014. While lower
court rulings have gone in its favor, the borough estimates its maximum
exposure at $120 million if lost the case in its entirety. A second dispute
with the state of Alaska centers on whether excess tax revenues collected
after revaluations belong to the borough or the state.

The outcome of such disputes is hard to predict, but upcoming rulings could
put downward pressure on the rating if the borough were forced to repay the
entire contingent liability in one payment. The borough has the resources to
repay the contingent liability, but the payment would draw the borough's
$154.9 million unrestricted fund balance to a level ($34.9 million or 8.4% of
spending) that would be inconsistent with the current rating if sustained.
However, the borough would have the option of increasing permanent fund
withdrawals for a period of time and could recover a more robust financial
cushion over a period of a few years. Fitch will continue to monitor judicial
rulings on TAPS and the borough's reaction to such rulings, but the borough
appears to have the resources and flexibility to respond to even the worst
case scenario.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Tax-Supported
Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from
Creditscope and IHS Global Insight.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012);

--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Tax-Supported Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=686015

U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=685314

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=804201

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS.
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL,
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM
THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER
PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS
OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN
EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER
ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Contact:

Fitch Ratings
Media Relations
Elizabeth Fogerty, New York
Tel: +1 212-908-0526
Email: elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com
or
Primary Analyst
Andrew Ward
Associate Director
+1-415-732-5617
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
650 California Street
4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
or
Secondary Analyst
Bernhard Fischer
Director
+1-212-908-9167
or
Committee Chairperson
Amy Laskey
Managing Director
+1-212-908-0568
 
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.