HEATHROW CHALLENGES GATWICK’S CLAIMS ON LONG-HAUL ROUTES

     (The following press release from Heathrow was received by e-mail. The 
sender verified the statement.) 
27 Sep 2013 01:0 
Heathrow challenges Gatwick’s claims on long-haul routes 
 Heathrow is today submitting evidence to the Airports Commission challenging 
Gatwick’s claims that it is able to support long-haul flights to growth 
markets. 
This follows the recent news that Air China is suspending flights from Gatwick 
to Beijing, the withdrawal of Korean Air and the cancellation of the proposed 
Garuda Indonesia flight from Gatwick to Jakarta this winter. In total, 20 
long-haul airlines have withdrawn from Gatwick in the last five years. 
Direct long-haul flights are critical to supporting trade and growth. UK 
businesses trade 20 times more with emerging markets that have daily flights 
than those with less frequent or no direct service. 
Gatwick maintains that long-haul flights do not need to operate from a hub 
airport. Yet, in the ten years that Heathrow has been full, Gatwick has failed 
to deliver flights to long-haul business destinations. Airlines that have been 
unable to access slots at Heathrow have tried and failed to make long-haul 
flights from Gatwick work.  
Long-haul airlines that have withdrawn all flights from Gatwick since 2008: 
(Table. To view content, please see the original one online) 
Heathrow Chief Executive Colin Matthews said: 
“There is no need for a crystal ball to test Gatwick’s claims that it can 
provide long-haul flights when we have the hard evidence of ten years of 
failure. While Heathrow has been full, airline after airline has tried without 
success to make long-haul flights from Gatwick work. Gatwick doesn’t have a 
flight to New York, one of the world’s most important business and financial 
centres, so it’s not surprising it can’t support routes to the less popular and 
more distant destinations that will be critical to future trade. 
“Gatwick’s proposal to prevent Heathrow expanding, while adding a new runway at 
its own airport, endangers Britain’s future competitiveness. It is a zero-hub 
solution that will lead to an irreversible decline in Britain’s international 
connections. Only a hub airport with the scale to compete internationally can 
provide the long-haul flights the UK needs.” 
Heathrow is not opposed to growth at Gatwick as long as it is alongside 
building an expanded hub airport. A new runway at Gatwick alone would deliver 
neither the flights that Britain needs nor the £100bn of economic benefits and 
more than 70,000 jobs that a third runway at Heathrow will. 
Many of the airlines which have pulled out of Gatwick instead operate flights 
to economic competitors in France, Germany and Holland. The issue is not a lack 
of demand from London, but that without levelling out the daily peaks and 
troughs in local demand with transfer passengers, Gatwick cannot fill long-haul 
aircraft and compete with Paris, Frankfurt, and Amsterdam. Some of Gatwick’s 
flights to Vietnam, one of the last long-haul services to an emerging market 
from the airport, are now flying via Frankfurt to pick up more passengers to 
make the flight viable.  
Hub airports, where local passengers combine with transfer passengers, are 
uniquely important in allowing airlines to fly to growth destinations. Heathrow 
serves more than 70 global destinations that are not served by another UK 
airport and is one of only six airports world-wide that serves more than 50 
long-haul destinations. This gives UK consumers a greater choice of 
destinations and makes Britain a more attractive location for international 
business. This source of competitive advantage for the UK cannot be sustained 
by Gatwick’s proposals. 
There are no European countries that have two hubs and no successful examples 
of what Gatwick is proposing. Analysis by York Aviation shows that adding 
capacity at other London airports but not at a hub would mean fewer routes than 
today, while adding new runway capacity at a single hub would mean London and 
the UK could add more than 100 new routes1.  
Airlines say they won’t move to Gatwick or Stansted2. Despite Gatwick and 
Stansted having spare capacity and lower charges neither has been able to 
attract the long-haul flights that Heathrow does. Over the period in which 
Gatwick lost 20 long-haul airlines it gained just six that are still operating, 
mostly to leisure destinations – Thomson, Monarch, Caribbean, Gambia Bird, 
Vietnam, and Iraqi. 
Note to editors: 
1. York Aviation study for Transport for London: 
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/york-aviation-london-airports-r
oute-networks-2050.pdf 
2. ‘Big air alliances rule out move from Heathrow’, Financial Times, 11 August 
2013 
Heathrow Airport media centre
Heathrow Airport
Office: +44 (0)20 8745 7224
Email: media_centre@heathrow.com 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  
Image: British Airways Boeing 747 400
http://mediacentre.heathrowairport.com/imagelibrary/detail.aspx?MediaDetailsID=1
89&HUserID=CHdbYZPlPtY8Z15QKMGX6A.. 
http://mediacentre.heathrowairport.com/webuser/profile.aspx?HUserID=CHdbYZPlPtY8
Z15QKMGX6A..&EditProfile=True 
http://mediacentre.heathrowairport.com/webuser/unsubscribe.aspx?HUserID=CHdbYZPl
PtY8Z15QKMGX6A..&email=newsalert@bloomberg.net
 
 
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.