Market Snapshot
  • U.S.
  • Europe
  • Asia
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
DJIA 16,408.54 -16.31 -0.10%
S&P 500 1,864.85 2.54 0.14%
NASDAQ 4,095.52 9.29 0.23%
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
STOXX 50 3,155.81 16.55 0.53%
FTSE 100 6,625.25 41.08 0.62%
DAX 9,409.71 91.89 0.99%
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
NIKKEI 14,516.27 98.74 0.68%
TOPIX 1,173.37 6.78 0.58%
HANG SENG 22,760.24 64.23 0.28%

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit Against LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.



  Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit Against
  LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.

Business Wire

NEW YORK -- August 27, 2013

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”)
(http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/lightinthebox/) today announced that a class
action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York on behalf of purchasers of LightInTheBox Holding Co.,
Ltd. (“LightInTheBox”) (NYSE:LITB) American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) during
the period between its June 6, 2013 initial public stock offering (“IPO”) and
August 19, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than
60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions
concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff’s
counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Robbins Geller at
800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com. If you are a
member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join
this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/lightinthebox/. Any
member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff
through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an
absent class member.

The complaint charges LightInTheBox and certain of its officers and directors
with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. LightInTheBox,
organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Beijing,
China, is a global online retail company that sells directly to consumers via
the Internet. The Company offers products in three core categories: apparel
(including wedding dresses), small accessories and gadgets, and home and
garden.

The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants issued
materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial
performance and future prospects. In particular, defendants misrepresented or
failed to disclose the following adverse facts, which were known to defendants
or recklessly disregarded by them: (a) LightInTheBox’s sales growth had
dramatically decreased during the second quarter of 2013, the period ended
June 30, 2013; (b) LightInTheBox’s costs had grown more than its sales during
the second quarter of 2013; and (c) as a result of the foregoing, the Company
was not on track to achieve the financial results defendants had led the
market to expect during the Class Period.

On August 19, 2013, after the close of trading, the Company issued a press
release announcing its actual second quarter 2013 financial results for the
quarter ended June 30, 2013, less than one month after the IPO. Rather than
the earnings of $.06 per share on revenues of $75.8 million the investment
community had been led to expect, LightInTheBox reported revenues of just
$72.2 million and profits (excluding items) of $.05 per share. In addition,
revenues rose only 52.6% while operating costs rose 57%. The Company also
forecast revenues of just $68-$70 million for the third quarter of 2013
(ending just a little more than a month away, on September 30, 2013), whereas
analysts had been led to expect $75.8 million. On this news, the price of
LightInTheBox ADSs, which had traded as high as $23.38 per share in intraday
trading during the Class Period (on August 14, 2013), plummeted approximately
40% from their close on August 19, 2013, to close below $12 per share on
August 20, 2013.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of
LightInTheBox ADSs during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is
represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor
class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Robbins Geller represents U.S. and international institutional investors in
contingency-based securities and corporate litigation. With nearly 200 lawyers
in nine offices, the firm represents hundreds of public and multi-employer
pension funds with combined assets under management in excess of $2 trillion.
The firm has obtained many of the largest recoveries and has been ranked
number one in the number of shareholder class action recoveries in MSCI’s Top
SCAS 50 every year since 2003. Please visit http://www.rgrdlaw.com for more
information.

Contact:

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
Samuel H. Rudman, 800-449-4900
David A. Rosenfeld
djr@rgrdlaw.com
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
Advertisements
Sponsored Links
Advertisement