Samsung Beats Apple in New Smartphone Customer Satisfaction Study from ACSI

  Samsung Beats Apple in New Smartphone Customer Satisfaction Study from ACSI

Business Wire

ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- July 31, 2013

Samsung hits a home run with its Galaxy S III and Note II, according to a
smartphone brand study released today by the American Customer Satisfaction
Index (ACSI). The new study provides 2013 customer satisfaction benchmarks for
10 of the past year’s top-selling smartphone models in the United States.

Samsung’s flagship model for 2012, the S III, receives an ACSI benchmark of 84
(on a 0 to 100 scale), beating Apple’s iPhone 5 at 82, the company’s most
recent smartphone offering. Another Samsung model, Note II, shares the top of
list at 84. Galaxy S4 is not included because the ACSI study was fielded just
prior to its launch.

Smartphone Customer Satisfaction 2013
Model                  Manufacturer          ACSI Score
                                                     (0 to 100 scale)
Galaxy S III           Samsung               84
Galaxy Note II             Samsung                   84
iPhone 5                   Apple                     82
iPhone 4S                  Apple                     82
iPhone 4                   Apple                     81
Droid Razr Maxx HD         Motorola Mobility         80
Galaxy S II                Samsung                   78
Droid Razr                 Motorola Mobility         77
Curve                      BlackBerry                67
Bold                   BlackBerry            64

While U.S. customers give Samsung’s smartphones the top scores, Korean
consumers prefer Apple. According to the National Customer Satisfaction Index
(NCSI) in South Korea, which uses the same technology as the ACSI, the iPhone
5 has higher customer satisfaction than Galaxy S III.

The smartphone segment of the cell phone market is growing at a rapid clip,
and ACSI data suggest that smartphone users are much more satisfied than are
feature phone users.

Overall, smartphones earn a customer satisfaction score of 76 compared to 69
for feature phones.

“While feature phones are cheaper, and therefore viewed by many customers as
better value, smartphones excel in quality,” says Claes Fornell, ACSI founder
and Chairman. “Smartphones receive strong marks for feature variety, design
and ease of use, with battery life as their only real shortcoming.”

The iPhone 4S matches its successor—iPhone 5—with an ACSI score of 82. Apple’s
iPhone 4 is just a point below at 81. On the other hand, at a score of 78,
customer satisfaction with the Galaxy S II, precursor to the S III, is lower.
Motorola Mobility’s Droid Razr Maxx HD comes in at 80, while the Droid Razr
scores 77. The low end belongs to BlackBerry, far below competition, with 67
and 64, respectively, for its Curve and Bold smartphones.

“Not only does Samsung edge ahead of all iPhones, Apple customers themselves
don’t see much difference between the iPhone 4, 4S or 5,” says ACSI Director
David VanAmburg. “The latest earnings report from Apple was better than
expected, but the name of the game for Apple has always been innovation.
Samsung, on the other hand, shows a strong upward ACSI trend from the Galaxy S
II to the Galaxy S III. If the S4 performs as well—or even better—in the eyes
of customers, Samsung could threaten Apple’s dominance in overall customer

The smartphone brand study complements and expands the ACSI’s coverage of the
cell phone industry, updated in May 2013, gauging customer satisfaction with
each company’s complete array of product offerings—smartphones and feature
phones. As reported earlier, Apple’s overall ACSI score is 81, a 2% drop
compared with 2012, but strong enough to retain the industry lead.

Unlike Apple, which has a smartphone-only lineup, Samsung offers both feature
and smartphones. At 76, Samsung continues to lag Apple for overall customer
satisfaction. Nevertheless, the company’s 7% gain in 2013 is a clear
reflection of the strength of Galaxy S III.

“Like Apple, BlackBerry offers smart devices only, yet the company stays
firmly entrenched at the bottom of the industry in customer satisfaction,”
says Fornell. “This does not bode well for BlackBerry considering that smart
typically outperforms feature when it comes to cell phones.”

Stay connected with the ACSI on Twitter at @theACSI and Like us on Facebook.

No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the data and
information in this release without the express prior written consent of ACSI

About ACSI

The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) is a national economic
indicator of customer evaluations of the quality of products and services
available to household consumers in the United States. The ACSI uses data from
interviews with roughly 70,000 customers annually as inputs to an econometric
model for analyzing customer satisfaction with more than 230 companies in 43
industries and 10 economic sectors, as well as over 100 services, programs,
and websites of federal government agencies.

ACSI results are released on a monthly basis, with all measures reported on
scale of 0 to 100. ACSI data have proven to be strongly related to a number of
essential indicators of micro and macroeconomic performance. For example,
firms with higher levels of customer satisfaction tend to have higher earnings
and stock returns relative to competitors. Stock portfolios based on companies
that show strong performance in ACSI deliver excess returns in up markets as
well as down markets. And, at the macro level, customer satisfaction has been
shown to be predictive of both consumer spending and GDP growth.

The Index was founded at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business
and is produced by ACSI LLC. The ACSI can be found on the Web at


Chaat Butsunturn, 415-391-7900 x1214
Amanda Piasecki, 202-535-7800 x1114
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.