Starboard Files Definitive Proxy Materials to Elect Four Highly Qualified Director Nominees to the Office Depot Board of

  Starboard Files Definitive Proxy Materials to Elect Four Highly Qualified
 Director Nominees to the Office Depot Board of Directors at Upcoming Annual
                                   Meeting

Delivers Letter Urging Shareholders to Upgrade the Office Depot Board by
Voting the GOLD Proxy Card to Elect Starboard's Extremely Qualified and
Experienced Director Candidates -- Cynthia Jamison, Robert Nardelli, Jeffrey
Smith and Joseph S. Vassalluzzo

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, July 23, 2013

NEW YORK, July 23, 2013 /PRNewswire/ --Starboard Value LP (together with its
affiliates, "Starboard"), the largest shareholder of Office Depot, Inc.
(NYSE:ODP) ("Office Depot" or the "Company") with approximately 14.6% of the
outstanding common stock of the Company, announced today that it has filed
definitive proxy materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Company's 2013 Annual Meeting and has delivered a letter
to the shareholders of Office Depot.

Starboard is urging shareholders to elect its four highly qualified nominees,
Cynthia Jamison, Robert Nardelli, Jeffrey Smith and Joseph S. Vassalluzzo, to
serve on the Company's board of directors at the upcoming 2013 Annual Meeting.

The full text of the letter follows:

July 23, 2013

Dear Fellow Office Depot Shareholders,

Starboard's Interests are Directly Aligned with Shareholders

It is Time to Vastly Upgrade Office Depot's Board of Directors

Vote the GOLD Proxy Card Today!

Starboard Value LP, together with its affiliates ("Starboard"), currently owns
approximately 14.6% of the outstanding common shares of Office Depot, Inc.
("Office Depot" or the "Company"), making us Office Depot's largest
shareholder. Additionally, pro forma for the proposed merger (the "OfficeMax
Merger") between Office Depot and OfficeMax Incorporated ("OfficeMax"), we
believe Starboard would be the largest shareholder of the combined company.
We have nominated four highly-qualified director candidates – Cynthia Jamison,
Robert Nardelli, Jeffrey Smith, and Joseph S. Vassalluzzo – to replace four
current incumbent Office Depot directors – Thomas Colligan, Marsha Evans,
Eugene Fife, and Scott Hedrick – at the upcoming 2013 annual meeting of
shareholders (the "2013 Annual Meeting). We believe that each of our nominees
is uniquely qualified to oversee and govern Office Depot and has the
skill-sets necessary to substantially improve the operating performance and
value of Office Depot. We further believe it would be difficult for anyone to
argue that our director candidates are not collectively much more highly
qualified and more experienced than the four incumbent directors we are
seeking to replace. As the largest shareholder of Office Depot, we only want
what is best for the Company and its shareholders, which includes addressing
the severe challenges with the current strategy and significantly improving
Office Depot's persistently poor operating performance.

Until the OfficeMax Merger is completed, Office Depot will continue to operate
as a stand-alone company. We are in favor of the OfficeMax Merger, but it is
still subject to antitrust approval. Office Depot has historically held its
annual meeting of shareholders towards the end of April. OfficeMax held its
annual meeting as per usual at the end of April. Office Depot used stall
tactics to delay announcing a date for its 2013 Annual Meeting until we filed
a complaint with the Delaware Chancery Court to compel the annual meeting
under Delaware law. Shareholders are entitled to choose the best possible
board of directors to represent their interests and, we believe, it is
necessary to significantly improve Office Depot's board of directors (the
"Board") for three primary reasons:

  1)Should the OfficeMax Merger not be completed for any reason,
  shareholders absolutely need a vastly improved Board;

  2)During the pendency of the OfficeMax Merger, many key decisions will
  likely be made including, most notably, the potential selection of the new
  CEO for the combined company. Shareholders need a much improved Board to
  help ensure the best, most qualified CEO is chosen; and

  3)Office Depot will be designating five directors to serve on the combined
  company board and Starboard's director candidates, if elected, would be
  among the Office Depot directors with the most retail operating experience
  and relevant expertise, and therefore, we believe, should be among the
  designees to any combined company board and have an opportunity to directly
  shape the future of any combined entity.

We would appreciate your support as we work hard to try and protect and
enhance the value of our collective Company through the election of a better
and more qualified Board.

The OfficeMax Merger and Sale of the Mexico JV Interest Cannot Hide the Fact
that the Current Board Has Overseen Years of Disastrous Operational
Performance

Ultimately, the future value of your investment in the Company is going to
hinge on whether Office Depot can effectively execute an operational
turnaround on a stand-alone basis or otherwise effectively execute an
integration plan for the OfficeMax Merger. While we are pleased with the Board
for coordinating the OfficeMax Merger and for finally selling Office Depot de
Mexico after we and other shareholders had been urging such action for months,
we also realize that coordinating long-overdue extraordinary transactions does
not now make the Board qualified to execute on the ordinary business.
Unfortunately, when you put these transactions aside and look at Office
Depot's actual, underlying business operations, the current Board has overseen
disastrous operational performance, including some of the worst operating
margins in not only its industry but in the entire retail sector, and has
entirely failed in its efforts to execute a turnaround of the Company. This
continued poor performance and lack of any credible turnaround plan has
resulted in the destruction of significant shareholder value over time. In
fact, prior to the filing of our initial Schedule 13D on September 17, 2012,
Office Depot's shares had declined by 87% over the last five years, massively
underperforming both the market and its peers.

We are now at a critical juncture for the future success of our Company, and
it is absolutely the right time for shareholders to vastly upgrade the quality
of the Board by electing the most capable and experienced director
candidates. If history is any lesson, we cannot afford to leave the Company's
operational oversight in the hands of the current Board or otherwise rely on
the current Board to designate the right mix of directors to serve on a
combined board of directors with OfficeMax or take the proper steps in
assisting in the selection of the future CEO.

Our Involvement at Office Depot Has Been Positive and Has Created Benefits for
All Shareholders

As many of you know, over the past ten months, we have been working hard on
behalf of all Office Depot shareholders to push for the value enhancing
changes necessary in order for shareholders to realize the full potential for
their Office Depot investment. Through five public letters and numerous
private communications with the Board, we have expressed the serious cause for
our concern at Office Depot and have clearly articulated our views on how to
improve and unlock value at the Company. Despite years of inaction by the
current Board and management team prior to our involvement, the Company has
just recently begun to take action by announcing:

  1)the Merger with OfficeMax; and

  2)the Sale of Office Depot de Mexico to Grupo Gigante for approximately
  $690 million.

We do not believe it is a coincidence that these actions were taken only after
we emerged and threatened a proxy contest. The current Board members have a
track record of doing the bare minimum they believe necessary to ensure their
positions on the Board. In the three and five-year periods prior to our
initial 13D filing, Office Depot's stock price declined by 59.9%, and 87.1%,
respectively, and was flat in the one-year period prior to our filing. In
comparison, since our initial 13D filing, Office Depot's stock price has
appreciated by 75%, outperforming the S&P 500 by 52% over that timeframe.

Office Depot's Operating Performance Under the Current Board's Watch Has Been
Dreadful and Appears to Be Getting Worse

The Board is in Dire Need of Highly-Qualified and Experienced Directors to
Best Position Office Depot for an Operational Turnaround and Future Success

While the OfficeMax Merger and sale of the Mexico JV Interest have resulted in
improved value for shareholders, these actions speak very little to the
serious operational shortcomings that have been plaguing the Company for years
and the current Board's seeming inability and unwillingness to address, or
even acknowledge, its deep-rooted operational troubles. Now is not the time
for the Board to pat itself on the back or try to sweep the Company's
significant operational issues under the rug. There is still much more to be
done to tackle the Company's serious operational issues and unlock the full
potential value at Office Depot. In order to improve the probability of
achieving substantial improvements at a large retailer, it is best to have
qualified retail and turnaround experts to provide guidance, counsel, and
oversight.

The fact remains that the overall financial performance of the business
continues to deteriorate and there is a great deal that must be accomplished
to ensure a bright future for Office Depot, whether as a stand-alone entity or
a combined company. Office Depot's operating margins are the worst among its
Office Supply Superstore ("OSS") peers and some of the worst in the entire
retail industry. While we recognize the challenges inherent in the OSS
sector, the reality is that Office Depot's results are far worse than where
the Company should be operating given its significant scale and the quality of
its assets. In fact, Office Depot generated operating margins of only 0.9% in
2012, well below the operating margins of both Staples, Inc. ("Staples") and
OfficeMax of 6.3% and 2.0%, respectively. Unfortunately, the Company's
results appear to only be getting worse, as evidenced by last quarter's 5%
decline in sales and 37% decline in total operating profit.

Supporting Our Highly Qualified Nominees Will Change a Minority of the Board
and
Provide a Mandate to Improve Operating Performance and Enhance Shareholder
Value

Do not be misled. The election of our director candidates will not disrupt
the OfficeMax Merger. We are in favor of the OfficeMax Merger and recommended
that the Board try to consummate a merger. As a minority on the Board, our
nominees are committed to working constructively with the remaining incumbent
members of the Board to oversee Office Depot with the best interests of all
shareholders as the primary objective.

While we hope and expect the deal with OfficeMax will ultimately be approved,
it is subject to antitrust approval, and therefore, Office Depot must be
prepared to face either outcome -- combining with OfficeMax or continuing as a
stand-alone company. Given the significant deterioration in the profitability
and destruction in value of the Company under the watch of the current Board,
shareholders cannot afford to simply continue with the status quo and hope for
improved results down the road, if, and only if, the Company is merged with
OfficeMax. Instead, shareholders need to seize this opportunity to elect a
Board that is capable of overseeing the Company regardless of whether the deal
with OfficeMax is ultimately approved. By adding highly qualified director
candidates that have the requisite skill to immediately improve the current
operating performance of the business, Office Depot can be in a position to
succeed on a stand-alone basis and be in a position to maximize the long-term
synergies with OfficeMax if the OfficeMax Merger is approved.

In addition, if the OfficeMax Merger is ultimately consummated, Office Depot
will need a highly qualified Board to help put the merged Company on a path
toward completely transforming the business. In the near term, this will
include: (i) working with a committee of OfficeMax directors to conduct a
formal process to identify and select a Chief Executive Officer of the
combined company; and (ii) selecting five Board members to serve on the
combined Office Depot / OfficeMax board.

Over the long run, this newly formed Board will be tasked with developing the
long-term plan of the combined company. This will include: (i) integrating
two large companies that, combined, will have revenue of over $17 billion,
(ii) helping to identify and retain a new management team made up of some
existing executives from each company as well as some entirely new people,
(iii) examining the retail locations that should be kept versus exited, and
(iv) coming up with a new business strategy to be successful over the long
term, as well as other key decisions.

The current Board has proven that it is ill-equipped to successfully oversee a
stand-alone Office Depot, let alone to execute on any of the exceedingly
important, and complicated, actions noted above that will determine and help
shape the future of the combined company, assuming the OfficeMax Merger is
completed. It is therefore critically important that the Board be
strengthened with new directors now who have the necessary operating and
retail experience to help oversee an operational turnaround of Office Depot.
Only in this way will shareholders be able to have comfort that the operating
performance and value of Office Depot will be significantly improved either as
a stand-alone company if the deal is not approved or as a merged company if
the deal is completed.

Do Not Let the Opportunity Pass to Vastly Upgrade the Board with the Most
Qualified and Experienced Director Candidates

Starboard's highly qualified nominees have the requisite skill sets needed to
transform Office Depot.

We have selected these nominees after an exhaustive search process to identify
potential board candidates, and we are confident that they are better
qualified to oversee Office Depot at this critical juncture than the current
Board members who we are seeking to replace. Collectively, our nominees have
an incredibly well-balanced mix of skills, including deep backgrounds in
public company operations and board service, as well as substantial retail
operating experience, which is indispensable for a successful turnaround of
Office Depot. As you will find below, the current Board, and specifically the
four incumbent directors whom we are running against, are sorely lacking in
these areas.

Our highly qualified director candidates include:

Cynthia T. Jamison serves on the board of directors of Tractor Supply Company,
where she is currently lead director and has served as the chair of several
committees since joining the board in 2002. Ms. Jamison has also served as a
director of B&G Foods, Inc., since 2004. Previously, Ms. Jamison served on the
boards of directors of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. and Horizon Organic Holding
Corp. before both companies were sold at high premiums to their market prices.
As part of her role as a partner with Tatum LLC ("Tatum"), an executive
services firm, Ms. Jamison has been the Chief Financial Officer or Chief
Operating Officer of several publicly and privately held companies, including
AquaSpy, Inc., eMac, Inc, a joint venture between McDonald's Corporation and
KKR & Co. L.P., and Cosi, Inc. Prior to joining Tatum, Ms. Jamison served as
Chief Financial Officer of Chart House Enterprises and held various positions
at Allied Domecq Retailing USA, Kraft General Foods, and Arthur Andersen LLP.
Ms. Jamison's experience in handling financial and technical turnaround
challenges together with her high level, strategic insight at the governance
level, make her an excellent candidate for the Board.

Robert L. Nardelli is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of XLR-8, LLC,
Investment & Advisory Co., an investment and consulting company, he
established in 2012. Commencing in 2007, Mr. Nardelli has served in several
capacities at Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. ("Cerberus"), a private
investment firm, including as an Interim CEO of several of its portfolio
companies and as the CEO of Cerberus Operations & Advisory Company, LLC, and
is currently the Senior Advisor to Steve Feinberg, Cerberus' founder. In 2007,
Cerberus named Mr. Nardelli to the role of Chairman and CEO of Chrysler LLC
("Chrysler"), the automaker, which he held until 2009, at which time he
returned to Cerberus. While at Chrysler, Mr. Nardelli implemented several
strategic moves that analysts say helped the firm emerge from restructuring.
Mr. Nardelli was also the CEO and Chairman of The Home Depot, Inc. ("Home
Depot"), the home improvement retailer, from 2000 through 2006, where he also
served as a director. During Mr. Nardelli's tenure, Home Depot's revenues and
net earnings doubled, 1,000 new stores were opened and 135,000 new jobs were
added. From 2002 until 2005, Mr. Nardelli served on the Board of Directors of
The Coca-Cola Company. He also held several senior executive posts at General
Electric Company during the period from 1971 to 2000, except from 1988 – 1992,
when he took leave of GE to become Senior Vice President and General Manager
of the Case Construction Equipment global company. While at GE, Mr. Nardelli
was the Chief Executive Officer of two of its major companies, GE Power
Systems and GE Transportation Systems. He earned an MBA from the University of
Louisville in 1975 and a Bachelor of Science degree in business from Western
Illinois University in 1971. His 40-plus years of global operating experience,
financial expertise, consistent performance and an impressive track record
serving on the boards of directors of public companies, will make him a
valuable addition to the Board.

Jeffrey C. Smith is co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment
Officer of Starboard Value LP, a New York-based investment firm that is the
largest shareholder of Office Depot. Mr. Smith has extensive public company
board experience. Currently, he serves on the board of directors of Regis
Corporation and Quantum Corporation. Previously, he was the Chairman of the
Board of Phoenix Technologies Ltd. until its sale to Marlin Equity Partners,
and served on the boards of directors of Zoran Corporation until its sale to
CSR plc, Actel Corporation until its sale to Microsemi Corporation, S1
Corporation, Kensey Nash Corp. and SurModics Inc. Mr. Smith also served as a
member of the Management Committee for Register.com. In addition to extensive
public board experience, Mr. Smith has significant experience evaluating
companies from a financial, operational, and strategic perspective to identify
inefficiencies and the resulting opportunities for value creation. Mr. Smith's
extensive public board experience and experience in a variety of industries
together with his management experience in a variety of roles will enable him
to provide invaluable oversight to the Company's Board.

Joseph S. Vassalluzzo currently serves as a director on a number of public
company boards, including Federal Realty Investment Trust, where he is
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, and Life Time Fitness, where he is Lead
Director and Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Vassalluzzo also
operates a retail consulting business and served as a director and Chairman of
the Nominating Committee of iParty Corp until its sale to Party City Holdings
Inc. in May 2013. Previously, among other roles, Mr. Vassalluzzo was employed
by Staples, from 1989 until 2005, most recently as Vice Chairman, where he had
world-wide responsibility for all of Staples' real estate activities,
including, but not limited to: the development and management of all retail
stores; distribution; office and warehouse centers; all engineering,
construction and design activities; and facilities management. In addition,
Mr. Vassalluzzo was responsible for the legal department's activities and
negotiated the majority of Staples M&A transactions. Mr. Vassalluzzo's
managerial and industry knowledge, as well as his extensive service on public
company boards, make him an excellent candidate for the Board.

We believe the election of these new directors to the Board would add
substantial expertise, renewed credibility, and a fresh perspective to help
ensure that all future decisions are made with the best interests of all
shareholders as the primary objective. Over the past several months, these
individuals have been working alongside Starboard and one of the world's
leading restructuring firms, whom we have engaged, to develop a detailed plan
to significantly improve the operating performance and value of Office Depot,
as a stand-alone company or to execute on an effective integration plan to
take full advantage of the synergy opportunities available in the OfficeMax
merger and the long-term benefits of a combination. We plan on publicly
disclosing details of this plan in an extensive investor presentation within
the next two weeks.

The Current Board Lacks the Retail Experience Necessary to Oversee Office
Depot

We believe that at the core of Office Depot's problems is the lack of retail
experience on the Board and management team. The Company currently operates
at the worst margins among its peers despite having been an early leader in
the space and having a substantially larger revenue base than OfficeMax. Yet,
instead of addressing these issues earlier, the Company continued to employ a
CEO with little to no background in retail and a Board composed primarily of
directors with little, if any, background in retail. In fact, prior to the
most recent Board appointment, only two out of the ten Office Depot Board
members had relevant retail operating experience, and the current CEO of
Office Depot, Neil Austrian, has a background that consists of a role as the
COO of the National Football League and investment banking.

Therefore, we believe it is critically important to replace four of the
Company's incumbent Board members, none of whom have relevant retail operating
experience, with the highly qualified nominees we have proposed.

Review the background and qualifications of the following Board members we are
seeking to replace and ask yourself if they have anywhere close to the same
level of qualifications and experience as our director candidates. We think
you will agree that the choice is clear.

Scott Hedrick – Mr. Hedrick is currently the lead independent director of
Office Depot. He has served on the Board for over 20 years, despite not
having any apparent relevant retail operating experience^1. Over his tenure,
Office Depot went from one of the leading office supply companies to the worst
performing office supply company. Glass Lewis recommendedshareholders vote
"AGAINST" Mr. Hedrick at the 2012 annual meeting, citing Mr. Hedrick as having
served as a member of the Compensation Committee "for the past three fiscal
years, during which time the Company was deficient in linking pay with
performance." During the period from the time Mr. Hedrick joined the Board in
April 1991 until our initial 13D filing on September 17, 2012, Office Depot's
stock price declined by 42%. Overall, since Mr. Hedrick joined the Board, the
Company's stock price has modestly increased by just 3%, as of July 19, 2013,
an underperformance compared to the S&P of 619%.

^1 Based on our review of Mr. Hedrick's biographical information found in the
Company's proxy statement.

Marsha Evans – Ms. Evans has been on the Board of Office Depot for
approximately 7 years, despite not having any apparent relevant retail
operating experience^2. Ms. Evans' primary operating roles have consisted of
non-profit companies, including as acting commissioner of the LPGA Golf
Association and CEO of the American Red Cross. Ms. Evans has served on the
Compensation Committee since her appointment to the Board in September 2006,
and has served as chair of the Compensation Committee since 2009. Glass Lewis
has given the Company a pay-for-performance grade of "F" for four of the last
five years and has recommended shareholders vote "AGAINST" Ms. Evans for each
of the last four years. In fact, Glass Lewis has stated that it "Question[s]
her continued service on any public Board." During the period from the time
Ms. Evans joined the Board until our initial 13D filing on September 17, 2012,
Office Depot's stock price declined by 93%. Overall, since Ms. Evans joined
the Board, the Company's stock price has declined by 88%, as of July 19, 2013.

^2Based on our review of Ms. Evans' biographical information found in the
Company's proxy statement.

Thomas Colligan – Mr. Colligan has been on the Board since January 2010 and is
currently the chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Colligan also appears to have
no relevant retail operating experience^3, and instead, his primary experience
for the last six years consists primarily of academic-related professions,
including Vice Dean of The Wharton School's Aresty Institute of Executive
Education and as Managing Director at Duke Corporate Education, which is
affiliated with Duke University's Fuqua School of Business. Prior to that,
Mr. Colligan was Vice Chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. As a member of
the Audit Committee, Glass Lewis recommended shareholders vote "AGAINST" Mr.
Colligan at the 2011 annual meeting, citing "restatements [which] may signal
weak internal accounting expertise, poor internal controls and aggressive
financial reporting practices at the Company." During the period from the
time Mr. Colligan joined the Board until our initial 13D filing on September
17, 2012, Office Depot's stock price declined by 63%. Overall, since joining
the Board, the Company's stock price has declined by 36%, as of July 19, 2013.

^3 Based on our review of Mr. Colligan's biographical information found in the
Company's proxy statement.

Eugene Fife – Mr. Fife has been on the Board since July 2012. Like the other
three current directors we are running against, Mr. Fife also appears to have
no relevant retail operating experience^4 and his primary occupation is
serving as a managing principal of a venture capital firm. Mr. Fife joined the
Board pursuant to the BC Partners preferred ownership stake in Office Depot
which, at the time, contractually provided BC Partners with three Board
seats. Given that BC Partners' preferred stake is currently half of what it
was at the time, Office Depot is now only contractually obligated to provide
two Board seats to BC Partners. However, rather than seek to replace Mr. Fife
with a truly independent Board member with excellent qualifications and
relevant retail experience, Office Depot has instead decided to re-nominate
him and change his classification from "affiliate" to "independent." The
reality is that not only does Mr. Fife appear to lack relevant retail
operating experience, he is listed as a senior advisor to BC Partners^5.
Given his continued affiliation with BC Partners, we question Mr. Fife's
ability to be truly "independent" or whether he will be heavily inclined to
put BC Partners' interests ahead of the interests of the common shareholders.

^4 Based on our review of Mr. Fife's biographical information found in the
Company's proxy statement.
^5 As disclosed on the BC Partners website. www.bcpartners.com

The Current Board Has Sought to Entrench Itself and Has Overseen Troubling
Corporate Governance Practices

Unfortunately, despite the continued underperformance of the Company and
recommendations against certain directors from leading independent proxy
advisory firms, Office Depot has shown little interest in improving its Board
for the benefit of shareholders. Instead, the Board has shown a propensity
for seeking to entrench itself and protect its own interests at the expense of
shareholders. Just days after Starboard filed an amended 13D disclosing a
14.8% position in Office Depot, the Company adopted a "poison pill" with a 15%
ownership limitation (the "Poison Pill") without shareholder approval. At the
time, Office Depot hypocritically controlled 22% of the Company's voting power
on almost all matters put to a shareholder vote, including director elections,
since BC Partners is required to vote in accordance with the recommendation of
the Board. While Office Depot claimed that it was instituting the pill to
protect itself against "hostile acquirers", we believe the action was an
exceedingly transparent attempt to cap our ownership at our current position
and limit the collective voting ability of shareholders, while protecting the
status quo. Further, the way in which the Poison Pill was constructed was
even more troubling. In addition to capping shareholders at a 15% ownership
limit while the Board effectively controlled 22% of the voting power at the
time, the Board also:

  1)Continued to allow the Company to pay BC Partners dividends in-kind,
  thereby increasing the ownership and voting power of BC Partners, which as
  mentioned above, the Board effectively controls.

  2)Allowed for an exemption for BC Partners to acquire an additional 2% of
  the outstanding common stock on top of the in-kind dividend payments.

The Poison Pill therefore had the cumulative effect of potentially increasing
the Board's voting power up to approximately 25%, which, in turn, would
decrease the voting power of a 15% shareholder to approximately 11.5%. The
Poison Pill is a self-serving entrenchment device designed, we believe, to
severely limit shareholder influence over Board composition and increase the
voting control of the Board. As of today, the Poison Pill remains in place.
In fact, the Company has attempted to use the Poison Pill as a negotiating
tool in our settlement discussions offering to redeem the Poison Pill only if
we accept the Company's otherwise inadequate settlement proposal and rescind
our nomination notice.

We further question the Board's decision to effectively provide BC Partners
with representation amounting to one-third of the Board following the
redemption of one-half of BC Partners' preferred shares on July 10, 2013.
Specifically, the Governance and Nominating Committee decided to
"independently nominate" Mr. Fife, who previously served as a BC Partners
designee, as a continuing independent director. Upon the closing of the
OfficeMax Merger, BC Partners' remaining preferred shares are set to be
redeemed. We cannot understand why the Company has decided to provide BC
Partners with effective representation above and beyond the two seats that it
is otherwise contractually obligated to provide. We note that Starboard's
14.6% economic position in the Company translates to voting power of
approximately 12.8% in the election of directors due to the 12.3% of voting
power entitled to BC Partners that the Company effectively controls. It is
deeply troubling and incredibly frustrating that the Company, on the one hand,
is providing such disproportionate representation to BC Partners while, on the
other hand, refuses to work constructively with Starboard to reconstitute the
Board in a manner consistent with the best interests of the Company's
shareholders.

In addition to the self-serving and shareholder-unfriendly Poison Pill, the
Board has also continued to play games with the 2013 Annual Meeting. For at
least the last six years, Office Depot has held its Annual Meeting in the
latter half of April, including the 2012 Annual Meeting which was held on
April 26, 2012. Yet rather than hold the 2013 Annual Meeting in April, as has
been the historical practice, the Board decided to delay the 2013 Annual
Meeting after we nominated directors for election to the Board. It was not
until after we had launched a consent solicitation to remove and replace
directors and commenced a proceeding in the Delaware Chancery Court that
Office Depot finally announced its 2013 Annual Meeting date. The Board has
effectively disenfranchised shareholders while entrenching itself for an
additional four-month period and should be held accountable. Notably, the
Company's merger partner, OfficeMax, held its 2013 annual meeting in the
normal course on April 29, 2013. It is entirely disingenuous for the Company
to make any claims in this election contest that now is not the right time to
elect new Board members when it was the Board that manipulated the timing of
the 2013 Annual Meeting in the first place.

IT IS TIME FOR CHANGE AT OFFICE DEPOT – VOTE THE GOLD PROXY CARD TODAY

Office Depot is currently at a critical juncture. The Company's performance
has continued to deteriorate and substantial value has been destroyed. The
Company needs new, highly qualified directors that have the requisite
skill-sets and experience needed to dramatically improve the operations of the
business and transform the Company for the future, whether as a stand-alone or
merged company. The current Board of Office Depot lacks the relevant retail
operating experience needed to improve the Company, and has continued to take
actions to the detriment of its shareholders.

We have nominated four highly qualified individuals that are ready to
represent your interests in the boardroom and protect and maximize the value
of your shares in the Company. As the largest shareholder of Office Depot,
our interests are directly aligned with yours, and we continue to believe that
there is significant value to be realized at the Company. Starboard has a
long history of investing in undervalued and underperforming public companies
and identifying and executing on opportunities to unlock value for the benefit
of all shareholders. While our efforts to date have produced positive
results, there is much more work to be done that can produce even more value
for shareholders.

As stated earlier, our nominees have been working alongside Starboard and one
of the world's leading restructuring firms for the past nine months to develop
a detailed plan to significantly improve the operating performance and value
of Office Depot, as a stand-alone company or as a merged company. We plan on
publicly releasing this plan in an extensive investor presentation within the
next two weeks.

We want what is best for Office Depot and its shareholders and will endeavor
to represent all of our interests in the boardroom in order to protect and
maximize value.

VOTE FOR CHANGE AT OFFICE DEPOT TO ENSURE THAT THE COMPANY HAS THE BEST
POSSIBLE BOARD TO REPRESENT YOUR INTERESTS AND DELIVER IMPROVED RESULTS FOR
SHAREHOLDERS

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED GOLD PROXY CARD TODAY

If you have any questions, or require assistance with your vote, please
contact Okapi Partners LLC toll-free at (877) 869-0171 or email:
info@okapipartners.com.

We look forward to your support at the annual meeting.

Best Regards,

Jeffrey C. Smith
Starboard Value LP

About Starboard Value LP
Starboard Value LP is a New York-based investment adviser with a focused and
differentiated fundamental approach to investing in publicly traded U.S. small
cap companies. Starboard invests in deeply undervalued small cap companies and
actively engages with management teams and boards of directors to identify and
execute on opportunities to unlock value for the benefit of all shareholders.

Investor contacts:
Peter Feld, (212) 201-4878
Gavin Molinelli, (212) 201-4828
www.starboardvalue.com

Okapi Partners
Bruce H. Goldfarb/Patrick McHugh
(212) 297-0720

SOURCE Starboard Value LP

Website: http://www.starboardvalue.com
 
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.