Fitch Affirms Edison International at 'BBB' & So. California Edison Co. at 'A-'; Outlook Stable

  Fitch Affirms Edison International at 'BBB' & So. California Edison Co. at
  'A-'; Outlook Stable

Business Wire

NEW YORK -- January 10, 2013

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings of Edison International (EIX) and
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) as follows:

EIX

--Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BBB';

--Short-term IDR at 'F2';

--Senior unsecured at 'BBB'.

SCE

--Long-term IDR at 'A-';

--Short-term IDR at 'F1';

--Senior secured at 'A+';

--Senior unsecured at 'A';

--Senior secured pollution control revenue bonds at 'A+';

--Senior unsecured pollution control revenue bonds at 'A';

--Preferred at 'BBB+';

--Commercial paper at 'F1'.

The Rating Outlook for EIX and SCE is Stable. More than $13 billion of
consolidated EIX debt is affected by the rating action, including and $9.7
billion of SCE debt.

Key rating drivers for EIX and SCE include:

--A stable regulatory regime in the state of California;

--Strong projected utility operating cash flows, earnings and credit metrics;

--SCE's tiered rate structure and competitive inroads from alternative energy
supply is a long-term concern for investors;

--The filing of EME and sixteen subsidiaries for protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in December 2012;

--Clear separation of the Edison Mission Energy (EME) corporate complex from
EIX and SCE;

The EIX ratings affirmation and Stable Rating Outlook primarily reflect the
strong credit profile of its core operating electric utility subsidiary, SCE.
The ratings also consider the insolvency of EME, EIX's wholly owned merchant
generation subsidiary.

For the twelve month period ended Sept. 30, 2012, SCE accounted for all of
EIX's consolidated operating income and 62% of total EIX debt (including
off-balance-sheet debt).

EME Bankruptcy

EME and 16 of its wholly owned subsidiaries filed for protection under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on Dec. 17, 2012. EIX has managed EME on a
stand-alone basis, and Fitch does not expect any direct financial exposure
from the EME bankruptcy to the ultimate parent or SCE.

Fitch downgraded EME and operating subsidiary Midwest Generation LLC's issuer
default ratings to 'D' in December 2012.

EIX and SCE ratings incorporate the utility's strong, projected earnings and
cash flows, low debt leverage and a balanced regulatory/political environment
in California.

The ratings also recognize the challenges associated with SCE's large capital
expenditure program. SCE's tiered rate structure and competitive inroads from
alternative energy suppliers are key long-term rating concerns that could lead
to future credit rating downgrades.

Solid Credit Metrics

On a consolidated basis, Fitch estimates EIX EBITDA-to-interest expense of
4.0x in 2013 and 4.5x in 2014, as EME works its way through bankruptcy. Fitch
projects EIX debt-to-EBITDA of 3.7x in 2013 and 3.3x in 2014.

Fitch expects SCE's credit metrics to remain consistent with its current 'A-'
IDR, with EBITDA-to-interest and debt-to-EBITDA estimated to be better than 7x
and 3x, respectively, in 2013 and 2014.

Liquidity

As of Sept. 30, 2012, EIX had consolidated cash and cash equivalents on its
balance sheet totaling $1.080 billion. Of that amount, approximately $700
million resides at EME and is unavailable to EIX. Liquidity is strong at the
EIX parent-company level, with just $28 million drawn on its $1.25 billion
committed bank facility and just $400 million of outstanding debt maturing in
2017.

Maturities

SCE, as of Sept. 30, 2012, had available borrowing capacity of approximately
$2.2 billion on its $2.75 billion of committed bank facility. SCE 2012 - 2016
maturities are manageable, totaling $1.9 billion with $1.2 billion, $300
million and $400 million maturing in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Infrastructure Investment

The ratings also assume timely recovery of SCE's planned energy infrastructure
investment, which is expected to approximate $13 billion during 2012 - 2014.

SCE's capital investment program is focused on infrastructure spending to
accommodate growth, reliability and renewable energy development and is
consistent with California energy policy goals. Eighty percent of projected
capex is earmarked for transmission and distribution system improvements.

2012 GRC

The CPUC issued a final decision in SCE's 2012 GRC in November 2012. The GRC
was filed with the commission in November 2010. The 2012 revenue increase is
retroactive to Jan. 1, 2012 and will be recovered in rates in 2013.

The commission's final decision is a reasonably balanced outcome, in Fitch's
opinion, and supportive of earnings and cash flow credit metrics consistent
with SCE's 'A-' Issuer Default Rating.

The CPUC final decision grants rate increases totaling $986 million during
2012 - 2014, approximately 60% of the company's requested $1.6 billion.

COC

The CPUC issued a final decision in phase one of the COC proceeding Dec. 20,
2012, significantly reducing authorized returns in California.

SCE's authorized ROE was reduced to 10.45% from 11.5%. Factoring changes in
the cost of preferred and debt, SCE's revenue is expected to be approximately
$220 million lower per annum, effective Jan. 1, 2013.

Fitch notes that authorized returns in the state remain above the industry
average.

More importantly, regulatory mechanisms in the state provide a reasonable
opportunity for SCE and the other IOUs operating in California to earn their
authorized returns.

High SCE Funding Needs

As the result of anticipated high capital investment, Fitch expects SCE to be
free cash flow negative and that the external capital requirements at the
utility will be funded with a balanced mix of equity and debt, consistent with
its CPUC authorized capital structure.

Tariff Mechanisms Ameliorate Attrition

Revenue decoupling, regulatory balancing accounts, forward looking test years,
single issue rate cases and pre-approval of planned capital expenditures
greatly reduce SCE's exposure to regulatory lag and operating cash flow
attrition, in Fitch's opinion.

SCE Distributions

The ratings also consider CPUC regulations that limit dividends and cash
distributions from the utility to EIX. EIX relies on SCE dividends and
benefits from its tax sharing agreement to meet its obligations.

Discrete EME Operations

While inter-company loans and guarantees exist within the EME corporate
complex there are no cross defaults, inter-company loans or guarantees between
EME and either EIX or SCE.

EME has paid no dividends to EIX, nor has EIX invested capital in EME in the
decade preceding EME's December 2012 bankruptcy filing. EME and SCE are
discrete enterprises within the EIX corporate family and have separate
management teams.

What Could Trigger A Rating Upgrade

--Cancellation of EIX's ownership when EME emerges from bankruptcy could
result in an upgrade for EIX;

--An upgrade seems unlikely for SCE.

What Could Trigger A Rating Downgrade

--Significant deterioration in the regulatory compact in California could
result in downgrades at EIX and SCE;

--An unexpected change in EIX management strategy tilting toward aggressive
diversification and/or shareholder friendly actions, including debt funded
share repurchases could lead to future credit ratings downgrades.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings
above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has
been compensated for the provision of the ratings.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

--'Corporate Rating Methodology' (Aug. 8, 2012);

--'Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Utilities' (Nov. 12, 2012);

--'Rating North American Utilities, Power, Gas and Water Companies' (May 16,
2012);

--'Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage' (Aug. 8, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Corporate Rating Methodology

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=684460

Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Utilities

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=693750

Rating North American Utilities, Power, Gas, and Water Companies

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=625129

Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=685552

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS.
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL,
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM
THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE.

Contact:

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Philip W. Smyth, CFA
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0531
Fitch, Inc.
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
or
Secondary Analyst
Glen Grabelsky
Managing Director
+1-212-908-0577
or
Committee Chairperson
Jason Paraschac
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0746
or
Media Relations:
Brian Bertsch, +1-212-908-0549 (New York)
brian.bertsch@fitchratings.com
 
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.