Subaru Performs Strongly In Rigorous New IIHS Crash Test
- All 2013 models earned the 2013 Top Safety Pick (TSP)
- In addition, the 2013 Legacy and Outback models received the all-new 2013
CHERRY HILL, N.J., Dec. 20, 2012
CHERRY HILL, N.J., Dec. 20, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --Continuing its strong
performance in crash testing, the 2013MY Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza,
Subaru XV Crosstrek, Subaru Legacy, Subaru BRZ Subaru Outback, and Subaru
Tribeca vehicles have received the 2013 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
(IIHS) Top Safety Pick award (TSP).
(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20080325/SUBARULOGO )
Furthermore, the 2013 Subaru Legacy and Subaru Outback are the first Subaru
vehicles to have been tested for the Institute's 2013 "TSP+" award which
requires good ratings for occupant protection in at least 4 of 5 IIHS
evaluations, with no less than acceptable in any test. Both vehicles are now
rated as TSP+.
"The strong ratings of our products in IIHS testing supports Subaru's belief
in safety," said Thomas J. Doll, executive vice president and COO, Subaru of
America, Inc. "Having 100% of our models listed as IIHS Top Safety Picks and
now the Legacy and Outback models tested to TSP+ status demonstrates that."
The TOP SAFETY PICK recognizes vehicles that in IIHS testing do the best job
of protecting people in moderate overlap front, side, rear, and rollover
crashes based on 'good' ratings in each category. The IIHS ranks in terms of
Good, Acceptable, Marginal and Poor, with 'good' as the top rank possible in
Institute tests. Winners also must have electronic stability control.
"For four consecutive years, Subaru is the only automotive manufacturer with
the distinction of earning IIHS TOP SAFETY PICK awards for every model it
builds," said Institute president Adrian Lund. "Subaru deserves praise for
making safety a top priority."
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of a
moderate overlap frontal and small overlap crash test. Each vehicle's overall
evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant
compartment, injury measures recorded on a 50th percentile male Hybrid III
dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well
the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Building on its long-running vehicle ratings program for consumer information,
IIHS introduced the small overlap test in 2012 to further improve occupant
protection in frontal crashes. Most automakers design their vehicles for good
performance in the IIHS moderate overlap frontal test and the federal
government's full-width frontal test, but many haven't addressed the problem
of small overlap crashes. In a 2009 IIHS study of vehicles with good ratings
for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a
quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat
The small overlap test is a demanding crash that replicates what happens when
the front corner of a car collides with another vehicle or an object like a
tree or utility pole. In the test, 25 percent of a car's front end on the
driver side strikes a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 40 mph.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of
a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the
front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on
2-instrumented SID-IIs dummies representing a small (5th percentile) woman,
assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle's structural
performance during the impact.
Rear crash protection is rated according to a two-step procedure. Starting
points for the ratings are measurements of head restraint geometry -- the
height of a restraint and its horizontal distance behind the back of the head
of an average size man. Seat/head restraints with good or acceptable geometry
are tested dynamically using a dummy that measures forces on the neck. This
test simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear
at 20 mph. Seats without good or acceptable geometry are rated poor overall
because they can't be positioned to protect many people.
In the roof strength test, a metal plate is pushed against 1 side of a roof at
a constant speed. To earn a good rating for rollover protection, the roof must
withstand a force of 4 times the vehicle's weight before reaching 5 inches of
crush. This is called a strength-to-weight ratio. For an acceptable rating,
the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. A marginal rating value
is 2.5. Anything lower than that is rated poor.
About Subaru of America, Inc.
Subaru of America, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fuji Heavy Industries
Ltd. of Japan. Headquartered in Cherry Hill, N.J., the company markets and
distributes Subaru vehicles, parts and accessories through a network of more
than 600 dealers across the United States. All Subaru products are
manufactured in zero-landfill production plants and Subaru of Indiana
Automotive Inc. is the only U.S. automobile production plant to be designated
a backyard wildlife habitat by the National Wildlife Federation. For
additional information visit www.subaru.com. Media can visit
Subaru of America, Inc.
Subaru of America, Inc.
SOURCE Subaru of America, Inc.
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.