CALIFORNIA PROPOSES UTILITY PLAN TO SPEND CARBON PERMIT REVENUE

     (The following press release from the California Public Utilities 
Commission was received by e-mail and was reformatted. The sender verified the 
statement.) 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                           
PRESS RELEASE 
Docket #: R.11-03-012 
CPUC ISSUES PROPOSAL ON USE OF REVENUE FROM SALE OF GREENHOUSE GAS ALLOWANCES 
BY UTILITIES 
SAN FRANCISCO, November 16, 2012 - The California Public Utilities Commission 
(CPUC) today issued a Proposed Decision that would direct how revenues 
generated from the sale of greenhouse gas emission allowances allocated to the 
investor-owned electric utilities should be used.  If approved by the CPUC, the 
Proposed Decision would return approximately 85 percent of the allowance value 
directly to households as a rate reduction and a semi-annual “climate 
dividend.”  The total amount of revenue to be returned to ratepayers between 
2013 and 2020 is expected to range from $5.7 billion to $22.6 billion. For most 
non-residential customers, the Proposed Decision would follow the “polluter 
pays” principle by reflecting the cost of greenhouse gas emission allowances in 
rates.  By putting a price on greenhouse gas pollution, this approach maintains 
the incentive provided by the Cap-and-Trade program to reduce total greenhouse 
gas emissions through increased efficiency and greater reliance on clean 
generating technologies. 
As part of the California Air Resources Board’s (ARB) Greenhouse Gas 
Cap-and-Trade program, the ARB allocated allowances to the state’s electric 
distribution utilities to help compensate electricity customers for the costs 
that will be incurred under Cap-and-Trade.  The investor-owned electric 
utilities are required to sell all of their allowances at ARB’s quarterly 
auctions, the first of which occurred on Wednesday.  The proceeds from the 
auction are to be used for the benefit of retail ratepayers, consistent with 
the goals of Assembly Bill 32. The Proposed Decision is the result of the 
CPUC’s detailed consideration of how the utilities should use the revenues 
resulting from the sale of these allowances. 
The Proposed Decision establishes several primary policy objectives to guide 
the use of the allowance revenues. These primary objectives are to: 
·         Preserve the carbon pollution price signal in electricity rates; 
·         Ensure that economic activity does not shift to other states and 
countries as a result of the Cap-and-Trade program; 
·         Reduce adverse outcomes on low income households; and, 
·         Maintain competitive neutrality among the utilities and Community 
Choice energy programs and Direct Access providers. 
The Proposed Decision finds that, in general, electricity rates should reflect 
the cost of carbon, as determined by the price of emission allowances sold in 
the Cap-and-Trade program.  Preserving the carbon price signal is critical to 
providing appropriate incentives for businesses and individuals to reduce 
greenhouse gas emissions when making decisions regarding their energy use.  
However, in some circumstances, other important factors need to be considered.  
Following an extensive, stakeholder driven process, the Proposed Decision would 
allocate the revenues to each of the uses described below. 
First, to ensure the program does not disadvantage California industries, the 
Proposed Decision directs the investor-owned utilities to return allowance 
revenues to businesses operating in industries identified by ARB as 
emissions-intensive and trade-exposed. These businesses emit large amounts of 
greenhouse gas emissions and operate in competitive markets. This allocation of 
revenue is expected to cover the majority of the Cap-and-Trade-related costs 
these industries will experience in electricity rates while preserving 
incentives for these entities to reduce their emissions. The Proposed Decision 
also commits to consider in a follow-up process expanding the list of eligible 
industries to include trade-exposed entities that, while not 
emissions-intensive, face substantial indirect Cap-and-Trade costs through 
electricity purchases. 
Second, consistent with the direction provided by Senate Bill 1018, a bill that 
was attached to this year’s state budget, the Proposed Decision directs the 
investor-owned utilities to use allowance revenue to offset the Cap-and-Trade 
costs in small business electricity rates.  Over the 2013-2020 period, the 
electricity rates small businesses are subject to will gradually rise to 
reflect the cost of carbon. This is intended to enable small businesses to 
adjust to the Cap-and-Trade program through investments in energy efficiency, 
operational improvements, and clean energy technologies. The Proposed Decision 
defines qualifying small businesses as any non-residential customer – including 
agriculture, nonprofits, and others – that consumes less than 20 kilowatts of 
power. A proposal attached to the Proposed Decision sets forth a preliminary 
formula for revenue distribution to small businesses that will be further 
refined via a subsequent decision following a public workshop process. 
All of the remaining allowance revenue would be returned to residential 
customers, through two mechanisms.  First, the Proposed Decision directs the 
use of the allowance revenue to fully mitigate the carbon costs that would 
otherwise be reflected in residential rates.  While not in keeping with the 
general preference to preserve the carbon pollution price signal, in the case 
of the three large investor-owned utilities (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 
Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric), the Proposed 
Decision finds that an exception is warranted given the tiered structure of 
residential rates, which due to statutory constraints prevents carbon costs 
associated with residential consumption from being passed through to 
lower-tiers. Including the carbon cost only in upper-tier rates would further 
exacerbate the large gap that has developed between lower and upper-tier rates. 
 The Proposed Decision finds that including additional carbon costs resulting 
from the Cap-and-Trade program in upper-tier rates would be unfair to customers 
with consumption in the upper tiers. 
After using revenues for compensating emissions-intensive, trade 
exposed-industries and offsetting the carbon costs in small business and 
residential rates, the remaining revenues would be given to residential 
customers as an equal semi-annual bill credit for each residential account.  
This “climate dividend” is intended to help offset any increases in the costs 
of goods and services that may result from the Cap-and-Trade program.  In 
essence, under the compensation framework envisioned by the Proposed Decision, 
households will be paid by polluters for the right to emit greenhouse gases.  
This framework holds entities to account for their contributions to climate 
change, while limiting the impact of the Cap-and-Trade program on household 
budgets. 
The vote on the Proposed Decision is currently scheduled for December 20, 2012. 
Members of the public can comment on the Proposed Decision by contacting the 
CPUC’s Public Advisor’s Office at 415-703-2074 or 866-849-8390 (TTY 
866-836-7825) or public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov<mailto:public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov> 
or CPUC Public Advisor, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 2103, San Francisco, CA 
94102. Please reference proceeding number R.11-03-012. 
The Proposed Decision is available at 
http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M031/K744/31744787.PDF. 
For more information on the CPUC, please visit 
www.cpuc.ca.gov<http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/>. 
Media Contact: Terrie Prosper, 415.703.1366, news@cpuc.ca.gov           
(kgt)NY